Romney: "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" Answer: "Yes." (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:39:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney: "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" Answer: "Yes." (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney: "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" Answer: "Yes."  (Read 2212 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: September 02, 2012, 11:14:52 PM »


I hate that meme.  What shovel ready jobs?  What government bureaucracy is going to have plenty of constriction plans and environmental permits in hand for projects that they had no funding to achieve?  And if they did why weren't they being lambasted back before 2009 for wasting money on excessive planning and permitting when they could have used some of those funds to have less plans lying around and more construction already done?

The idea that infrastructure spending is something that these days can be quickly turned off and on is ludicrous.  Now perhaps if we had realized back in early 2009 that we'd still be in a bad spot we could have had a long term program that provided for stimulus spending over a four year period, but probably not because of the politics involved.  What politician of any party wants to say things are going to be that bad that long?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2012, 02:00:24 PM »

I hate that meme.  What shovel ready jobs?  What government bureaucracy is going to have plenty of constriction plans and environmental permits in hand for projects that they had no funding to achieve?

Actually, from my work experience, we actually had a lot of prospective projects lined that basically went "we're only going to do them if we get more money." Like a lot of stuff.

But then again, we didn't get sh**t from the stimulus. Well, besides a new office, which was actually quite unnecessary because the old office was quite fine.

And these projects were ones you could have put into immediate effect if you had the money?  No need for additional planning, permits, or qualified personnel to oversee them?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2012, 02:16:37 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Obviously you have never heard of the Militia Act of 1792.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Granted this requirement for citizens to buy firearms was within the scope of the Federal government's power "to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia", but wouldn't ensuring that the Militia is healthy and able-bodied be within that scope as well?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.