Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2014, 07:35:37 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Questions and Answers
| |-+  The Atlas
| | |-+  Petition to ban Pingvin
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Petition to ban Pingvin  (Read 1298 times)
butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« on: September 11, 2012, 11:27:46 am »
Ignore

x a Person

Pingvin has made disgusting statements many times, but this has irredeemably crossed over the line:
Too bad there are no more public executions. I'd love to see pedophiles suffering. Y'know, carving out organs, tortures, etc.
Logged

butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2012, 11:32:43 am »
Ignore

Uh-oh, I respect your position, but there are people who really, really deserve it:
1) Serial killers
2) Pedophiles
3) Rapists
Plus there is a fiscal side. State could get a lot of money for different stuff from the tickets on public executions.
Logged

Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26846
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2012, 11:38:28 am »
Ignore

Advocating torture as a means of punishment may be way out there (and of course is UnConstitutional), but it does not violate the terms of use to my knowledge.
Logged

butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2012, 11:44:07 am »
Ignore

Advocating torture as a means of punishment may be way out there (and of course is UnConstitutional), but it does not violate the terms of use to my knowledge.

Advocating public torture and public executions?
If it's not, it definitely should be.
Logged

Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38360
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2012, 11:48:12 am »
Ignore

I don't see how this is a bannable offense.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2012, 11:55:18 am »
Ignore

opposed -- Tweed
Logged
butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2012, 12:02:19 pm »
Ignore

Advocating torture as a means of punishment may be way out there (and of course is UnConstitutional), but it does not violate the terms of use to my knowledge.
I don't see how this is a bannable offense.

Quote
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law.

This should definitely fall under at least "hateful".
Logged

Lt. Governor TJ
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4370
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2012, 12:02:33 pm »
Ignore

If advocating torture was a bannable offense, opebo would be long gone Tongue
Logged
butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2012, 12:03:18 pm »
Ignore

If advocating torture was a bannable offense, opebo would be long gone Tongue

We all know that opebo is not totally serious. Pingvin, judging by his following posts, definitely is.
Logged

Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2012, 12:05:45 pm »
Ignore

If advocating torture was a bannable offense, opebo would be long gone Tongue

We all know that opebo is not totally serious. Pingvin, judging by his following posts, definitely is.

so you'd like us to submit to a reading of the ToS that requires an author to be 'serious'. 


the fact is that the ToS are essentially inoperable as guidelines for behavior on the forum.  the Moderators have made their own rules.  together they theoretically comprise an unwritten constitution.  it is our duty as Member non-Moderators to oppose a banning in any and all circumstances, or at least give the appearance that we do (exceptions being the odd case like a HarrisonFord.)
Logged
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2012, 12:11:30 pm »
Ignore

if we're staying within the Atlas Canon, it is clear that this Leip statement should serve to define "hateful speech":


Discrimination and Hateful Speech: Posts deemed to be discriminatory or hateful against other posters or groups in general due to race, religion, etc. are deleted when reported.

a statement is only subject to infraction (or ban) for being 'hateful' if it is directed against an individual poster (not the case here) or against a group on the basis of "race, religion, etc.".  while the 'etc.' is necessarily ambiguous it does not include the likes of convicted murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc; but rather homosexuals, blacks, transgenders, etc.

Pingvin, exonerated.
Logged
butafly [豚フライ]
a Person
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4318
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2012, 12:16:40 pm »
Ignore

if we're staying within the Atlas Canon, it is clear that this Leip statement should serve to define "hateful speech":


Discrimination and Hateful Speech: Posts deemed to be discriminatory or hateful against other posters or groups in general due to race, religion, etc. are deleted when reported.

a statement is only subject to infraction (or ban) for being 'hateful' if it is directed against an individual poster (not the case here) or against a group on the basis of "race, religion, etc.".  while the 'etc.' is necessarily ambiguous it does not include the likes of convicted murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc; but rather homosexuals, blacks, transgenders, etc.

Pingvin, exonerated.

Pedophilia is an orientation, as was duly explained by Cory in the thread in question.
Logged

Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37839
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2012, 12:18:37 pm »
Ignore

Pingvin have a right to voice his opinions, even if we strongly disagree or find them repulsive. He did nothing warranting a ban.

Oppose.
Logged

Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2012, 12:19:18 pm »
Ignore

if we're staying within the Atlas Canon, it is clear that this Leip statement should serve to define "hateful speech":


Discrimination and Hateful Speech: Posts deemed to be discriminatory or hateful against other posters or groups in general due to race, religion, etc. are deleted when reported.

a statement is only subject to infraction (or ban) for being 'hateful' if it is directed against an individual poster (not the case here) or against a group on the basis of "race, religion, etc.".  while the 'etc.' is necessarily ambiguous it does not include the likes of convicted murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc; but rather homosexuals, blacks, transgenders, etc.

Pingvin, exonerated.

Pedophilia is an orientation, as was duly explained by Cory in the thread in question.

it's not an orientation for the purposes of any rules or guidelines, it's a diagnosable psychiatric pathology.  whether or not it 'should be' is outside the scope of this question.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26846
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2012, 12:55:23 pm »
Ignore

Tweed, in this thread, for once you are making a lot of sense, and are most articulate and lucid about it. What happened?  Is this one of those very special moments where you are entirely sober, with no hangover?  Smiley
Logged

opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47647


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2012, 01:13:24 pm »
Ignore

Pedophilia is an orientation, as was duly explained by Cory in the thread in question.

it's not an orientation for the purposes of any rules or guidelines, it's a diagnosable psychiatric pathology.  whether or not it 'should be' is outside the scope of this question.

That is precisely the question at hand - whether or not the group is approved or disapproved by authority - and in addition it is not allowed to discuss whether or not it should be.

If we are to ban all 'offensive' speech against approved groups, then it is only those groups which are still defined by power as 'beyond the pale' which are still victimizable.  Once one has imposed censorship, the only question which remains is - what do they want us to say, or not to say?

If for example a black or a gay is supported by those who control speech, we must say certain things about them.  Conversely - and I am the Poster Boy for this - if the group under consideration is condemned by those who control speech, we must do precisely as pingvin has done.  Approbation is the bannable offense, not the converse.

It is unfortunate that the subject of the thread mentioned here, in which Pingving participated so correctly, is precisely not possible to discuss in any meaningful way on this forum, but that is completely beside the point.  Pingvin was carrying out the will of the speakers of the Atlas - those people are to be condemned, and to ban the poor lad for taking just a tiny step further to excoriation is the height of unfair pettiness.

« Last Edit: September 11, 2012, 01:15:53 pm by opebo »Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32559
Vatican City State
View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2012, 01:39:16 pm »
Ignore

Tweed, in this thread, for once you are making a lot of sense, and are most articulate and lucid about it. What happened?  Is this one of those very special moments where you are entirely sober, with no hangover?   Smiley

I hope tweed doesn't view this as a personal attack.......
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21656
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2012, 03:02:14 pm »
Ignore

Petition to ban anyone who signed this ludicrous garbage

x 20RP12
Logged

Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12899
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: September 11, 2012, 03:25:47 pm »
Ignore

The offending posts -- and yes, calling for someone to be eviscerated, even a child molester, is inappropriate for this forum -- have been deleted.
Logged

Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35180
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 1.48

P P P

View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: September 11, 2012, 04:35:09 pm »
Ignore

I agree with Tweed.

http://youtu.be/uCLJsGk-ip4?t=4s
Logged
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23670
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 11, 2012, 04:47:16 pm »
Ignore

Pingvin is my best sock account creation.  I refuse to let you ban him.
Logged

Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4396
Belgium


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2012, 07:26:21 pm »
Ignore

Pingvin is an even worse thread polluter than those 2, actually. Rarely posts anything of any value.

(But I guess he's really nice in Atlasia, or something)
Logged

Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32559
Vatican City State
View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2012, 08:30:23 am »
Ignore

The offending posts -- and yes, calling for someone to be eviscerated, even a child molester, is inappropriate for this forum -- have been deleted.

But it's hardly a bannable offense.
Logged
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5046
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2012, 09:42:04 pm »
Ignore

They are pushing it, but he's actually a good poster for a fascist. Don't support banning him though I expect those posts got major death points.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12954
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.26, S: 6.26

View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: September 15, 2012, 03:04:26 am »
Ignore

Strongly opposed.

x Miles
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines