Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 15, 2014, 09:57:17 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  538 Senate forecast released
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 538 Senate forecast released  (Read 547 times)
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2552


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« on: September 19, 2012, 12:59:04 am »
Ignore

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/fivethirtyeight-forecast-g-o-p-senate-hopes-slipping/

Quote
An unusually large number of Senate races remain competitive, meaning that a wide range of outcomes are still possible. Republicans have about a 10 percent chance of winning a net of at least six seats from Democrats, according to the forecast, which would give them control of at least 53 seats next year. However, there is also about a 20 percent chance that Democrats could actually gain Senate seats on balance, giving them at least 54. The only thing that seems completely assured is that neither party will control enough seats next year to hold a filibuster-proof majority.

But the odds of a favorable overall outcome for Democrats have increased in recent weeks. The forecast model now gives them a 70 percent chance of controlling the chamber, either by having at least 50 seats and the presidency, or 51 without it.

Although this represents the first official FiveThirtyEight forecast for the Senate this year, I ran backdated forecasts to July 1 based on the polls that were available at that time. Two weeks ago, for example, the model would have given Democrats a 52 percent chance of retaining Senate control and four weeks ago, it would have given them a 39 percent chance.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15007
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2012, 01:07:41 am »
Ignore

Nice.

My only disagreement is that they have Berkley more likely to win than Tester.


Also, Berg is more favored than Fischer.
Logged


BeccaM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1111
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2012, 04:43:51 am »
Ignore

Nice.

My only disagreement is that they have Berkley more likely to win than Tester.


Also, Berg is more favored than Fischer.

Not at all.
Logged

Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5212
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2012, 05:22:08 am »
Ignore

I'm disappointed. Taken individually, each estimate is reasonable, but put them together and you have a lot of problems: Berg is not more likely to win than Fischer, yes, but the one that came to my mind was that Akin is not more likely to win than Brown. Tim Kaine is not more likely than Dean Heller. Denny Rehberg is also not more likely than Tommy Thompson. And so on and so forth.

Is it pretty realistic? Yeah. Does it favor the Ds a bit? Yeah.
Logged

I apologize for being so adamantly right.
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5297
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2012, 05:26:09 am »
Ignore

Nah I can understand why...there's quite a bit of focus on the partisan ballot and fundraising.

I don't think Florida is Safe Dem though, which is the major one I concern about.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3988
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2012, 06:50:55 am »
Ignore

And lol at West Virginia.  Raese doesn't stand a chance in hell. 
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15007
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2012, 08:37:13 am »
Ignore

Nice.

My only disagreement is that they have Berkley more likely to win than Tester.


Also, Berg is more favored than Fischer.

Not at all.

...Berg has an 82% chance of winning and Fischer has a 77% chance.
Logged


Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8875
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2012, 08:37:22 pm »
Ignore

Why is TN labeled as 96% Republican win when the other slam-dunk states are at 99%?
Logged
ℒief
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32598
Dominica


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2012, 09:08:03 pm »
Ignore

Republican chances of taking the Senate plummeted today, down to 21%.
Logged

THE PEOPLE'S GOVERNOR



It seems like Lief's posts sometimes have a sexual tint to them. I've definitely seen references to spanking more than once.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28199
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2012, 03:17:28 am »
Ignore

Why is TN labeled as 96% Republican win when the other slam-dunk states are at 99%?

Probably because the complete lack of polls coming out of Tennessee leaves his model unable to be more certain.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines