Romney releases 2011 tax record
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:04:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney releases 2011 tax record
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Romney releases 2011 tax record  (Read 2179 times)
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,182
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2012, 03:32:14 PM »


Indeed.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2012, 04:28:39 PM »

I'm sure that Romney doesn't feel 'entitled' to get the carried interest tax break allowing him to pay such a low rate, unlike those moocher households that pay 15% on payroll taxes but dont pay income tax.

Bingo!

Romeny's a smart guy, but his life is so insulated he apparantly never once in his life considered this.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2012, 04:31:01 PM »

Hilarious in hindsight: “I don’t think you want someone as the candidate for president who pays more taxes than he owes.”
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2012, 04:32:49 PM »

The Kerrys and the Gores are wealthier than the Romneys. The Kennedy clan isn't exactly poor, either.

Reid said put up or shut up to Romney. Romney put up. Will Reid now admit he lied?

First line: How in God's Green Earth this relates......?

Second: Uh no, releasing two hand-picked years pryed out, with a crowbar of political pressure, is hardly "putting up". Roll Eyes
Logged
Craigo
Rookie
**
Posts: 169
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2012, 05:07:02 PM »

Romney's preliminary estimate released earlier this year reported AGI of $20 million, instead of the $13 million reported today.

Possible explanations:

1. Transferred income to one of his trusts (the one given in this article)
2. Chose to report a previous loss on this return instead
3. Chose to carry some of his gains forward into a future return

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/09/21/the-mysteries-in-mitt-romneys-tax-return

Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2012, 05:24:34 PM »

The Kerrys and the Gores are wealthier than the Romneys. The Kennedy clan isn't exactly poor, either.

Reid said put up or shut up to Romney. Romney put up. Will Reid now admit he lied?

First line: How in God's Green Earth this relates......?

Second: Uh no, releasing two hand-picked years pryed out, with a crowbar of political pressure, is hardly "putting up". Roll Eyes

Apparently, you are underinformed. Reid stated he had a "reliable source" whom told him Romney paid no taxes for ten years. Romney's accounting firm has released the amount of taxes he has paid as percentage of his income for twenty years.  That information shows Reid's claim is simply false.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2012, 05:35:14 PM »

http://www.mittromney.com/disclosure/letter-from-pwc

You can read here the simple facts that show Reid's claim to be false.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 21, 2012, 05:39:23 PM »


So we should just trust Mitt, his website, and his accountants on this? Roll Eyes

...no, thanks...
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 21, 2012, 05:44:40 PM »

The Kerrys and the Gores are wealthier than the Romneys. The Kennedy clan isn't exactly poor, either.

Reid said put up or shut up to Romney. Romney put up. Will Reid now admit he lied?

First line: How in God's Green Earth this relates......?

Second: Uh no, releasing two hand-picked years pryed out, with a crowbar of political pressure, is hardly "putting up". Roll Eyes

You should be familiar enough with Bob's trolling by now to know the first thing he would do here is attack Reid.

This was Reid's response.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 21, 2012, 05:47:27 PM »


So we should just trust Mitt, his website, and his accountants on this? Roll Eyes

...no, thanks...

Instead of admitting the obvious fact that Harry Reid lied, folks are resorting to bizarre conspiracy theories. It is simply absurd to assert that an accounting firm would put its very existence at stake by swearing out a notarized report that was false.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,146
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 21, 2012, 05:51:36 PM »

He has a lower percent, but still pays more taxes than you even w/ a higher income.

That's not how that works. It's about the tax burden, Romney's is clearly lower than those in lower income brackets. Fail.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 21, 2012, 06:38:54 PM »

The Kerrys and the Gores are wealthier than the Romneys. The Kennedy clan isn't exactly poor, either.

Reid said put up or shut up to Romney. Romney put up. Will Reid now admit he lied?

First line: How in God's Green Earth this relates......?

Second: Uh no, releasing two hand-picked years pryed out, with a crowbar of political pressure, is hardly "putting up". Roll Eyes

You should be familiar enough with Bob's trolling by now to know the first thing he would do here is attack Reid.

This was Reid's response.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This paragraph is from that article:

"According to the letter from PwC avowing the number, it is based on Romney's adjusted gross income. That means that, for instance, if Romney made investment profit of $20 million, but had losses of, say, $19.9 million, his adjusted gross income would only be $100,000. Paying 20.2 percent of $100,000 would cost Romney just over $20,000."

That is the statement of an economic ignoramus. Ones capital gains is ones profits minus ones capital losses. If that were the tax situation of some hypothetical person, he would have as income $100,000 on line  13, "capital gain or (loss)." If that were his only source of income his "total income," line 22, would be $100,000, and his "adjusted gross income," line 37, again, would be $100,000.

Surely, someone minimally aware of form 1040 could construct a hypothetical return in which "total income" and "adjusted gross income" differed radically. The point is that the author of that joke of an attempt at journalism could not. Nor, did his editor spot what was a pathetic error. That's doubly pathetic.

If you want to cite the ranting of an economic ignoramus be my guest. Don't expect anyone minimally aware of the tax code to take it seriously.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 21, 2012, 06:41:39 PM »

He has a lower percent, but still pays more taxes than you even w/ a higher income.

That's not how that works. It's about the tax burden, Romney's is clearly lower than those in lower income brackets. Fail.

The goal post shifts again.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 21, 2012, 06:47:06 PM »

He has a lower percent, but still pays more taxes than you even w/ a higher income.

That's not how that works. It's about the tax burden, Romney's is clearly lower than those in lower income brackets. Fail.

Actually, he pays a higher percentage than most middle class families, and the maximum rate on capital gains, with no deductions, is 15%.  He has deductions, because he has charitable donations.

Complaints about Romney's taxes:  EPIC FAIL
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,422
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 21, 2012, 06:50:56 PM »

The damage is done.  Romney's refusal to do this months ago made this into a thing.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: September 21, 2012, 07:34:14 PM »
« Edited: September 21, 2012, 07:58:10 PM by Former President Polnut »

He has a lower percent, but still pays more taxes than you even w/ a higher income.

That's not how that works. It's about the tax burden, Romney's is clearly lower than those in lower income brackets. Fail.

Actually, he pays a higher percentage than most middle class families, and the maximum rate on capital gains, with no deductions, is 15%.  He has deductions, because he has charitable donations.

Complaints about Romney's taxes:  EPIC FAIL

I was deeply uncomfortable with the Reid approach on this - but Romney made this an issue. So, while it's cute and all to say 'epic fail', there's a lot of fail to go around.

And again, I've got no idea why they've back-pedaled in this, my immediate reaction is the campaign HAS to try to neutralise this before the debates.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,464


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: September 21, 2012, 08:11:18 PM »

Which puts this issue back in the news cycle for at least a few days.

Typical Friday news dump.....then no one gives a f[inks] over the weekend.

This.

Smart move by Team Romney.

It wasn't a 'smart move', it was basic competence, something Team Romney has been noticeably lacking for months. It only looks like a good play because the rest of their game has been so lackluster. If they can keep this up through November it'll help, but they need some sort of game changer to win this. Romney is long past the point where just not failing can get him elected.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: September 21, 2012, 08:15:21 PM »

It's now official.  Romney is an idiot who deserves to lose.

He didn't claim the full amount of his charitable contributions because he didn't want to go below the percentage of his income in taxed paid that he said he would.

(To be fair, it appears to be the case that he made contributions assuming he'd earn more this year than he did.  But to not take the deductions for solely political reasons is idiotic.)
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: September 21, 2012, 08:16:25 PM »

I actually agree with Alex Castellanos, shoot me now.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 12 queries.