Battle of extremes 2016: Sanders vs. Rubio
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 06:52:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Battle of extremes 2016: Sanders vs. Rubio
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Battle of extremes 2016: Sanders vs. Rubio  (Read 4956 times)
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2012, 03:21:59 PM »

All right.  This has no chance of happening whatsoever, but it would be an interesting match-up.  I don't have time for a more detailed timeline, but hopefully this will suffice.  Say Obama wins in 2012, guts Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid again in another "grand bargain" with the Republicans, keeps the troops in Afghanistan, and does nothing about gay marriage or taxing the wealthy (or even cuts them).  He also gives more power to the fracking industry.  Meanwhile, the Tea Party takes control over the Republican party even more, saying that Romney lost due to being insufficiently conservative.  The nation, however, moves to the left in general, and the Occupy movement resurges. 

Sanders becomes the face of the Occupy movement and beats out Andrew Cuomo (pro-fracking, corporate-serving anti-union Wall Street puppet), Martin O'Malley (damaged by his trainwreck of a convention speech in 2012), Deval Patrick (attacked as an anti-union guy who distorts the facts in his speeches), Brian Schweitzer (whose inability to say whether he supports gay marriage and opposition to gun control harms him), and a bunch of other minor candidates. 

Rubio harnesses the conservative and rightward movement within the Republican party while also calling for generational change, and beats Chris Christie, Jon Hunstman, Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Perry, and Paul Ryan. 
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2012, 03:39:28 PM »

Rubio is pretty mainstream in the Republican Party, while Sanders is so far to the left (by American standards) he isn't actually a member of the Democratic Party.
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2012, 03:54:29 PM »

Sanders picks Van Jones as his running mate.  Jones is considered a smart choice.  Not only is he black as a bit of a counterweight to Rubio being Hispanic in terms of minority appeal (since Sanders' Jewishness isn't enough), but he's also very young, countering Rubio in another way.  He also brings many middle-class concerns to the ticket, being a staunch environmentalist.  While Sanders does have a very reliably environmentalist voting-record, it's less of a signature issue for him, being more economically oriented.  However, it doesn't bring in moderate Democratic and Independent voters.  

Rubio chooses Jim DeMint as his running mate.  DeMint brings an "old/middle-aged white guy" demographic to the ticket, giving Rubio help among Southern whites, but still alienating moderates.  
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2012, 03:58:42 PM »

Rubio is pretty mainstream in the Republican Party, while Sanders is so far to the left (by American standards) he isn't actually a member of the Democratic Party.
Among the Democratic establishment, Sanders is considered extreme.  Among the Democratic base, the word "socialism" makes him sound extreme, but when it comes down to the actual issues, he's quite popular among actual Democrats. 
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,334
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2012, 04:00:08 PM »

Calling Marco Rubio extreme is like calling Justin Bieber death metal.
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2012, 04:17:07 PM »
« Edited: September 26, 2012, 04:32:13 PM by Peternerdman »

Calling Marco Rubio extreme is like calling Justin Bieber death metal.
No offense, but I take that with a grain of salt coming from someone who supports the Constitutionalist Party.  Tongue
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,334
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2012, 04:35:42 PM »

Calling Marco Rubio extreme is like calling Justin Bieber death metal.

No offense, but I take that with a grain of salt coming from someone who supports the Constitutionalist Party.  Tongue

I don't. I support the Republican Party, but wear the C-PA avatar A. because I don't want to be confused with Krazen and/or Phil and B. because I am a Constitutionalist.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2012, 04:39:23 PM »

Rubio wins easily. Why? Conservatism is mainstream. Socialism isn't. All in all, probably the most massive GOP margin since '84.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 04:47:24 PM »

Martin O'Malley (damaged by his trainwreck of a convention speech in 2012)

Remember that guy Clinton from Arkansas? He seemed promising. Maybe he could have beaten Cuomo in the 1992 primaries had he not given such a bad speech in 1988.
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2012, 04:56:27 PM »

Martin O'Malley (damaged by his trainwreck of a convention speech in 2012)

Remember that guy Clinton from Arkansas? He seemed promising. Maybe he could have beaten Cuomo in the 1992 primaries had he not given such a bad speech in 1988.
Fair enough.  But Clinton was much more charismatic too. 
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2012, 05:53:12 PM »

Rubio is basically just a generic Republican, as far as I can tell.  Is there really any reason why he's associated with the Tea Party, other than the fact that he was first elected in 2010?  If he'd been elected a few years earlier, then he would have had the same "tarnished" voting record as every other Republican on TARP, Medicare Part D, etc.  Because he was elected in the Obama years, he didn't have to go along with any of the stuff in the Bush years that conservatives don't like.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2012, 06:19:43 PM »

Yeah, Rubio isn't exceptionally right-wing. He was only TP-backed because his opponent was Charlie Crist.
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,175
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2012, 07:03:02 PM »

It wouldn't be a blow out. I'm telling you, Jews in the Northeast would support a fellow Northeastern Jew. That's a huge boost in the already left-wing states in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic. Rubio would win with over 300 EVs easily though.

If you want to do a real "Battle of the Extremes", have it be Bernie vs. Palin or Paul.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2012, 07:56:20 PM »

Rubio's not that extreme. Try Paul or DeMint or someone if you want right-wing extremism.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2012, 08:00:18 PM »

Calling Marco Rubio extreme is like calling Justin Bieber death metal.
No offense, but I take that with a grain of salt coming from someone who supports the Constitutionalist Party.  Tongue
If you read the Constitution Party platform, you would be surprised to see that they are a Ron Paul party, not the neocon Santorum machine they are made out to be. As a Floridian, who has met Rubio, I can tell you that he is a Cuban version of Charlie Crist. He is not at all extreme. Rand Paul vs Bernie Sanders...that would be a battle of extremes Tongue
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,334
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2012, 08:10:05 PM »

A battle of the extremes in this context would be Sanders v. Santorum
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2012, 08:12:41 PM »

Calling Marco Rubio extreme is like calling Justin Bieber death metal.
No offense, but I take that with a grain of salt coming from someone who supports the Constitutionalist Party.  Tongue
If you read the Constitution Party platform, you would be surprised to see that they are a Ron Paul party, not the neocon theocratic Santorum machine they are made out to be. As a Floridian, who has met Rubio, I can tell you that he is a Cuban version of Charlie Crist. He is not at all extreme. Rand Paul vs Bernie Sanders...that would be a battle of extremes Tongue
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2012, 02:46:30 PM »

Wow, this is news.  I always thought Rubio was a Tea Party guy. 
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2012, 09:45:51 AM »

I suppose I should try a Sanders vs. Rand Paul one.  This is disappointing. 
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2012, 10:11:20 AM »


Rubio: 406
Sanders: 132
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2012, 11:12:45 AM »

Sanders wins comfortably, if not by a landslide.  Easy, because people are more afraid of right-wing extremism than left-wing extremism.  (They think Stalin is better than Hitler, although Stalin killed four times as many people and Hitler was hardly a right-winger in many of his policies.)  Later on, I hope to post a map on this.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2012, 08:38:10 PM »

It's hard to think of Sanders as scary Smiley

Still, he would loose pretty badly everywhere outside the Northeast/West coast strongholds, and even there his margins would be underwhelming. For the simple reason, that he is, indeed, quite marginal. Now, of course, his chances of ever winning (or, for that matter, entering) a Dem primary are pretty much nil - to begin with, he'd have to become a Dem in the first place.
Logged
BM
BeccaM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,261
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 01, 2012, 04:49:45 AM »

Using Stalin and Hitler as examples of left/right in American politics? LOL

As others have said, Rubio wins easily because far right conservatism is more mainstream than far left liberalism in America, but Rubio isn't even that far right by Republican standards today, unfortunately. Sanders is way out of the box.

But perhaps more importantly, Rubio is attractive, charismatic, compelling, and from Florida while Sanders is a short, hideous, elderly curmudgeony midget from Vermont with wild hair, a hunchback, and an obnoxious accent.
Logged
independent-lefty
Rookie
**
Posts: 22
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2012, 06:03:15 PM »

Well, Sanders voted for the Heritage Foundation health insurance company/pharma bailouts, so are we talking about extremes of the same side?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.