Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 11:55:31 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Supreme Court case decided 25 September 2012
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Supreme Court case decided 25 September 2012  (Read 330 times)
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28447
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: October 01, 2012, 06:08:34 pm »

A per curiam opinion relating to redistricting which is probably why the Court did not wait until today to deliver it.

Tennant v. Jefferson County Commission
Reversed the decision of the District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia and affirmed the validity of the U.S. Congressional redistricting plan adopted by West Virginia.

Basically reaffirmed Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U. S. 725 (1983), but added the guidance that while computer technology makes it easier to devise districts that are mathematically equal in population than was the case then, that does not affect the validity of other legitimate state interests such as keeping political subdivisions intact, minimizing population transfer between districts, and determining whether incumbents will or will not have to face each other.

The plan West Virginia adopted has a population variance of 0.79%, second highest of the plans considered, but it was the only one that met the other interests the state had.

While the court did not explicitly say so, I think that plans with a variation of 1% or less can be considered generally safe from court challenge.

Logged

My November ballot:
Ervin(I) Gov.
Sellers(D) Lt. Gov.
Hammond(R) Sec. of State
Diggs(D) Att. Gen.
Herbert(D) Comptroller Gen.
Spearman(R) Supt. of Education
DeFelice(American) Commissioner of Agriculture
Hutto(D) US Sen (full)
Scott(R) US Sen (special)
Geddings(Labor) US House SC-2
Quinn(R) SC House District 69
Yes: Amendment 1 (Gen. Assembly may allow and regulate charity raffles)
No: Amendment 2 (end election of the Adjutant General)
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines