Home 2012 Election Results Election Info Weblog Wiki Search Email Site Info Store

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2013, 02:20:17 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  Would you be comfortable with a single woman President?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Would you be comfortable with a single (straight) woman President?
Yes   -46 (83.6%)
I would vote for her if necessary but would not be comfortable with a single woman President   -5 (9.1%)
No, I would not vote for a single woman President   -4 (7.3%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: Would you be comfortable with a single woman President?  (Read 1479 times)
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8510


View Profile
« on: January 29, 2005, 03:15:45 pm »
Ignore
Jake says no. I figured I'd make a poll on this.

Of course, I voted yes.
Logged


[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04
TheWildCard
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4574
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2005, 04:42:10 pm »
Ignore
Yes.

RICE '08!
Logged
Tory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1315


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2005, 05:31:50 pm »
Ignore
Depends on her views.

Barbara Boxer/Diane Feinstein: NO

Jennifer Granholm: Maybe

Maggie: Yes
Logged
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8510


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2005, 05:46:11 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Tory on January 29, 2005, 05:31:50 pm
Depends on her views.

Barbara Boxer/Diane Feinstein: NO

Jennifer Granholm: Maybe

Boxer, Feinstein, and Granholm are married.
Logged


[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49612


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2005, 06:06:24 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: nclib on January 29, 2005, 05:46:11 pm
Quote from: Tory on January 29, 2005, 05:31:50 pm
Depends on her views.

Barbara Boxer/Diane Feinstein: NO

Jennifer Granholm: Maybe

 Granholm are married.

She can't be President anyway. We'd need a Constitutional Amendment.
Logged


Support our boys in blue.
Jake
dubya2004
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18852
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2005, 08:26:25 pm »
Ignore
I posted my reason in the other thread.  And let me say, I don't have a problem with a women president.  It's the single part I don't like.
Logged
Tory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1315


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2005, 01:03:11 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: nclib on January 29, 2005, 05:46:11 pm
Quote from: Tory on January 29, 2005, 05:31:50 pm
Depends on her views.

Barbara Boxer/Diane Feinstein: NO

Jennifer Granholm: Maybe

Boxer, Feinstein, and Granholm are married.

I know that. I'm assuming they are not for the purpose of the thread.
Logged
TexasPatriot2024
TexasPatriot
Full Member
***
Posts: 142


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2005, 05:38:50 pm »
Ignore
It depends on her views. I wouldnt vote for Hilary Clinton married or unmarried. There is surly a single woman candidate out there that could get my vote.
Logged
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13218
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2005, 06:29:38 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: TexasPatriot2024 on January 30, 2005, 05:38:50 pm
It depends on her views. I wouldnt vote for Hilary Clinton married or unmarried. There is surly a single woman candidate out there that could get my vote.

well put.  same here.

I'm think a tall, butch bull-dyke but not quite as butch as Janet Reno.
Logged
dazzleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13911
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2005, 08:59:33 pm »
Ignore
It would depend upon how attractive she was....

Seriously, I would really only care about her views on political issues, and how she came across personally.  Marital status would not be a big issue one way or the other.
Logged
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6343
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2005, 09:39:55 pm »
Ignore
Yes.
Logged
Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31293
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2005, 09:57:19 pm »
Ignore
I don't care about gender or the sex life of my politicians, as long as it is not immoral or interfering with their duties.
Logged
n/c
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13218
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2005, 01:59:33 pm »
Ignore
I think 34 out of 40 really speaks for itself.

"you've come a long way, baby."
  --From 70s vintage Virginia Slims Billboards

Ah, anyone old enough when cigarette companies were still alowed to advertise?  Such days of government non-interference seem strange and foreign now, do they not?  The LP looks better by the day.  Smiley
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29261


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 01, 2005, 04:16:40 pm »
Ignore
There's also the question of - would you vote for her?
This poll doesn't say anything about her being single:
Logged
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13218
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2005, 05:53:03 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: jfern on February 01, 2005, 04:16:40 pm
There's also the question of - would you vote for her?

harder question isn't it?  do you vote on stuff like the candidate's gender or marital status?  my guess is no.  the answer to "would you vote for her?" involves knowing her position on issues, her past voting record (if applicable), and--just as is the case with married folks and with men--does she come across as someone you could trust?

As an aside, we have a logical/syllogistical/philosophical problem with the fact that 59% of "independents" would vote for a woman if their "party" nominated her.  (?!?!?!)  ummm, leave it to Fox to come up with that sort of bizarre observation.

brain-fart.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56699
French Polynesia


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 02, 2005, 08:54:22 am »
Ignore
Quote from: nclib on January 29, 2005, 05:46:11 pm
Quote from: Tory on January 29, 2005, 05:31:50 pm
Depends on her views.

Barbara Boxer/Diane Feinstein: NO

Jennifer Granholm: Maybe

Boxer, Feinstein, and Granholm are married.
So is thatcher, unless she is widowed by now.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will


Support Tahiti!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory