The Lancaster Intelligencer-Journal reports today that "Both opponents of the voter ID law and supporters of the law applaud the judge's ruling..." Apparently they'll ask for identification on voting day, and if you produce one, you can vote. If you do not produce one, you can vote. Everybody wins.
In other news, a local pub draws complaints. City council plans to meet with owner of Bull's Head Pub about patrons blocking the sidewalk when they gather there on busy nights.
That's not a win for supporters. We had that in the primary as a test run (as we should have). What does it do now? You can disagree with the requirement but for those that support it, you can't chalk this up as a win when it's essentially meaningless now.
