Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 22, 2014, 10:32:14 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Tender Branson, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | | |-+  TX-Texas Lyceum: Romney close to 60
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: TX-Texas Lyceum: Romney close to 60  (Read 366 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33264
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« on: October 02, 2012, 12:51:03 pm »

58-39 Romney

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2012/10/texas-poll-finds-romney-ahead-of-obama-perry-job-approval-ratings-down.html/
Logged
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16907
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2012, 12:51:51 pm »
Ignore

TX will probably be 56-42 or something.
Logged

AT&T likes to throw money around.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38302
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2012, 01:26:02 pm »
Ignore

Now something like this would definitely help to explain why the race remains somewhat close nationally.
Logged

What are you talking about Duke?  Things are great so far.   I do have to cling to God no matter what.  I have nothing against this at all,  but in my class there are 9 blacks and 4 whites.  African Americans are quite prevalent in that part of Tulsa.  I don't mind it at all,  but it is an interesting fact in white Oklahoma.
mondale84
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1322
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2012, 02:12:33 pm »
Ignore

Not buying this especially with Obama at 45% approval.
Logged


"There are no men like me. There's only me."
memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14419


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2012, 05:12:44 pm »
Ignore

Now something like this would definitely help to explain why the race remains somewhat close nationally.
No it doesn't. The margin in TX will negate about half of Obama's CA lead. And on top of that Obama will have large leads in NY and IL and smaller leads in PA, MI and OH. With FL a wash, Romney is far behind in the big states. Mid sized states aren't much better for the GOP. The Dems will have very strong numbers in MA, NJ, MD, and WA. And Obama will have more modest leads in MN, WI and VA. NC and MO will be narrow contests that won't affect the popular vote much. Romney will have leads in IN, AZ, TN, and GA, but the polls out of these states suggest his wins here won't be huge landslides. That leaves about a fifth of the country in states with less than 10 electoral votes. And Romney is likely to have large numerical margins in AL, LA, KY, and OK, and somewhat less so in SC which all put together have a population size much smaller than IL+NY. There just aren't enough people in the remaining states to make that much of a difference after Obama's dominance in the larger states, especially when Obama has his own remaining small but not tiny states, CT and OR, and CO will also provide a small Obama win. States with 6 or fewer EVs are about 10% of the population. Obama wins in DC, VT, HI, DE, RI, NM, NH, ME, NV, and IA will come close to cancelling out Romney's wins in UT, MS, AR, KS, WV, NE, ND, SD, MT, WY, ID, and AK. And that's the whole country.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 05:15:57 pm by memphis »Logged

I cannot do anything good under my own power. 
AT&T likes to throw money around.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38302
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2012, 07:14:06 am »
Ignore

Now something like this would definitely help to explain why the race remains somewhat close nationally.
No it doesn't. The margin in TX will negate about half of Obama's CA lead. And on top of that Obama will have large leads in NY and IL and smaller leads in PA, MI and OH. With FL a wash, Romney is far behind in the big states. Mid sized states aren't much better for the GOP. The Dems will have very strong numbers in MA, NJ, MD, and WA. And Obama will have more modest leads in MN, WI and VA. NC and MO will be narrow contests that won't affect the popular vote much. Romney will have leads in IN, AZ, TN, and GA, but the polls out of these states suggest his wins here won't be huge landslides. That leaves about a fifth of the country in states with less than 10 electoral votes. And Romney is likely to have large numerical margins in AL, LA, KY, and OK, and somewhat less so in SC which all put together have a population size much smaller than IL+NY. There just aren't enough people in the remaining states to make that much of a difference after Obama's dominance in the larger states, especially when Obama has his own remaining small but not tiny states, CT and OR, and CO will also provide a small Obama win. States with 6 or fewer EVs are about 10% of the population. Obama wins in DC, VT, HI, DE, RI, NM, NH, ME, NV, and IA will come close to cancelling out Romney's wins in UT, MS, AR, KS, WV, NE, ND, SD, MT, WY, ID, and AK. And that's the whole country.

Well, you've successfully damaged my eyes. Tongue
Logged

What are you talking about Duke?  Things are great so far.   I do have to cling to God no matter what.  I have nothing against this at all,  but in my class there are 9 blacks and 4 whites.  African Americans are quite prevalent in that part of Tulsa.  I don't mind it at all,  but it is an interesting fact in white Oklahoma.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines