600 member House of Reps (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:20:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  600 member House of Reps (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 600 member House of Reps  (Read 9925 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« on: January 30, 2005, 03:53:16 AM »

Dist 1: Bill Jenkins (R)
Dist 2: Jimmy Duncan (R)
Dist 3: Tim Burchett (R)
Dist 4: Lincoln Davis (D)
Dist 5: Zach Wamp (R)
Dist 6: Van Hilleary (R)
Dist. 7: Bill Ketron (R)
Dist. 8: Marsha Blackburn (R)
Dist. 9: Rob Briley (D)
Dist. 10: Dianne Black (R)
Dist: 11: John Tanner (D)
Dist. 12: Bob Schutt (R)
Dist. 13: Mark Norris (R)
Dist. 14: Harold Ford Jr. (D)

"Interesting" that despite there being 5 (or is it 4?) more Congressmen, you've managed to to draw on less Democratic congressman than there is at the moment...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2005, 06:36:54 AM »

Muhahahaha!

The odd man out (other than Jim Cooper who I think would be replaced by Briley) would be Bart Gordon.  Bart represents an increasingly Republican district but continues to get elected with huge margins based on a strong sense of loyalty and just enough Democrats to keep him afloat. (Not to mention weak GOP candidates since Gill and Blackburn's close losses in the mid 90's) Split up Rutherford county and give Trousdale and other Dem counties to Lincoln Davis and Gordon is out of the picture.

I'd spotted that... your map is an excellent example of the fact that a map doesn't have to look ugly to be biased towards one side.
Very clever... almost a work of art actually. Congratulations ;-)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2005, 06:40:42 AM »

I began this project to make state CD maps for a 600 member House.  I have Maine and PA finished with maps.  I have a bunch of others that I do not have computer maps for.  If anyone knows where to get good, large county maps, share.






Can't see the maps :-(
Can you do them in .png or .gif ?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2005, 11:47:47 AM »

I don't think Jon Fox would have survived until 2004, he only got 44% in a state house race this year.


Yeah that was pathetic. He's done with politics.

Or has politics done with him? ;-)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2005, 02:57:22 PM »

Jake: how many districts for each state?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2005, 03:35:00 PM »


Yay! :-)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I know the feeling...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2005, 03:30:27 AM »

I was going to comment about ME, but I see you've caught that.

Did you use the official 2000 numbers? I get the following list for apportionment (469K/seat with 600 seats):

AL 10, AK 1, AZ 11, AR 6, CA 72, CO 9, CT 7, DE 2, FL 34, GA 17, HI 3, ID 3, IL 26, IN 13, IA 6, KS 6, KY 9, LA 10,  ME 3, MD 11, MA 14, MI 21, MN 11, MS 6, MO 12, MT 2, NE 4, NV 4, NH 3, NJ 18, NM 4, NY 40, NC 17, ND 1, OH 24, OK 7, OR 7, PA 26, RI 2, SC 9, SD 2, TN 12, TX 45, UT 5, VT 1, VA 15, WA 13, WV 4, WI 11, WY 1


A real change in the number of seats could in principle be placed into effect for 2010 to be used in the next apportionment.  Using the projection method I discussed with jimrtex recently, and 600 seats, the ideal district would become 519K in 2010.

The new apportionment for 2010 would look like:
AL 9, AK 1, AZ 13, AR 6, CA 75, CO 10, CT 7, DE 2, FL 38, GA 19, HI 3, ID 3, IL 25, IN 12, IA 6, KS 5, KY 8, LA 9,  ME 3, MD 11, MA 13, MI 20, MN 10, MS 6, MO 11, MT 2, NE 3, NV 6, NH 3, NJ 17, NM 4, NY 38, NC 18, ND 1, OH 22, OK 7, OR 7, PA 24, RI 2, SC 9, SD 2, TN 12, TX 48, UT 5, VT 1, VA 15, WA 13, WV 4, WI 11, WY 1

Excellent...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2005, 11:14:44 AM »

WV is easy: just bring back the pre-'92 map and add a few counties to WV-4 'cos of population loss.
I'll post a map in a minute (interestingly there's no way that Capito could have won under the old map)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2005, 12:23:31 PM »



I moved Boone into WV-4... could have done more fiddling, but I suspect that the the above is the map that the legislature would draw.

As for Congressmen:

WV-1: Mollohan (D)
WV-2: Staggers (D)
WV-3: Humphreys (D)
WV-4: Rahall (D)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.