600 member House of Reps (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:11:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  600 member House of Reps (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 600 member House of Reps  (Read 9922 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« on: January 30, 2005, 12:50:56 AM »
« edited: May 14, 2005, 12:04:41 PM by Jake »

I began this project to make state CD maps for a 600 member House.  I have Maine and PA finished with maps.  I have a bunch of others that I do not have computer maps for.  If anyone knows where to get good, large county maps, share.



Now to the question, who would run against the following incumbents in 2004.
italics mean they are not running for re-election

District   1-Robert Borski (D)
District   2-Chaka Fattah (D)
District   3-Robert Brady (D)
District   4-Anthony Williams (D)
District   5-Jim Greenwood (GOP)
District   6-Jon Fox (GOP)
District   7-Joe Hoeffel (D)
District   8-Curt Weldon (GOP)
District   9-Joe Pitts (GOP)
District 10-Pat Toomey (GOP)
District 11-
District 12-Paul Kanjorski (D)
District 13-Tim Holden (D)
District 14-Robert Mellow (D)
District 15-Jeffrey Piccola (GOP)
District 16-Todd Platts (GOP)
District 17-Robert Jubelrier (GOP)
District 18-Phil English (GOP)
District 19-John Peterson (GOP)
District 20-Don Sherwood (GOP)
District 21-Melissa Hart (GOP)
District 22-Tim Murphy (GOP)
District 23-Mike Doyle (D)
District 24-John Murtha (D)
District 25-Ron Klink (D)
District 26-Bill Shuster (GOP)
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2005, 01:38:36 AM »

I think we need to bring back Kentucky's 7th district in the far eastern part of the state that the Republicans abolished after the 1990 census. I think that was the one district in Kentucky that had decent representation nonstop since the New Deal, so naturally they abolished it.

Edit: Actually the district around Bowling Green had a good congressman for years, but not anymore.

Hmmm, wonder why they got rid of it?  Maybe because Kentucky only gets 6 congressman.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2005, 01:17:41 PM »

The maps are updated.  The free image hosting site limits you to a certain amount of downloads.

For both maps I used counties.  Maine turned out almost perfect, as far as people in counties was concerned, though I think I used my wrong Maine map.  They should only have 3 reps, I think.   

htmldon's Tennessee is very good Smiley
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2005, 03:24:03 PM »

Jake: how many districts for each state?

I'll post the list later today.  It is buried in my desk.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2005, 07:16:34 PM »

I was going to comment about ME, but I see you've caught that.

Did you use the official 2000 numbers? I get the following list for apportionment (469K/seat with 600 seats):

AL 10, AK 1, AZ 11, AR 6, CA 72, CO 9, CT 7, DE 2, FL 34, GA 17, HI 3, ID 3, IL 26, IN 13, IA 6, KS 6, KY 9, LA 10,  ME 3, MD 11, MA 14, MI 21, MN 11, MS 6, MO 12, MT 2, NE 4, NV 4, NH 3, NJ 18, NM 4, NY 40, NC 17, ND 1, OH 24, OK 7, OR 7, PA 26, RI 2, SC 9, SD 2, TN 12, TX 45, UT 5, VT 1, VA 15, WA 13, WV 4, WI 11, WY 1


A real change in the number of seats could in principle be placed into effect for 2010 to be used in the next apportionment.  Using the projection method I discussed with jimrtex recently, and 600 seats, the ideal district would become 519K in 2010.

The new apportionment for 2010 would look like:
AL 9, AK 1, AZ 13, AR 6, CA 75, CO 10, CT 7, DE 2, FL 38, GA 19, HI 3, ID 3, IL 25, IN 12, IA 6, KS 5, KY 8, LA 9,  ME 3, MD 11, MA 13, MI 20, MN 10, MS 6, MO 11, MT 2, NE 3, NV 6, NH 3, NJ 17, NM 4, NY 38, NC 18, ND 1, OH 22, OK 7, OR 7, PA 24, RI 2, SC 9, SD 2, TN 12, TX 48, UT 5, VT 1, VA 15, WA 13, WV 4, WI 11, WY 1

Thank you muon, I couldn't find my list.  I think that Maine was for my 1000 seat project.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2005, 07:53:14 PM »

How would this effect the electoral college?  Would DC be entitled to more EVs?

I think the consitution gives it as many EVs as the smallest state.  WY still has 3, so I don't think DC would get more.   Electoral College would be 703.

Bush: 361

Kerry: 342
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.