Florida: WeAskAmerica: Romney +3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:15:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Florida: WeAskAmerica: Romney +3		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Florida: WeAskAmerica: Romney +3  (Read 1455 times)
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 05, 2012, 09:11:18 AM »
http://weaskamerica.com/2012/10/05/boing/

Obama: 46%
Romney: 49%

Obama led 49-46% in their last poll two weeks ago.
Logged
dirks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2012, 09:16:15 AM »
Republicans - 38%
Dems- -34%
Ind- 29%

is that a typical sampling for florida?

Romney has been nipping at Obama's heels in that state for quite a while
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2012, 09:18:53 AM »
« Edited: October 05, 2012, 09:20:31 AM by MorningInAmerica »
Quote from: dirks on October 05, 2012, 09:16:15 AM
Republicans - 38%
Dems- -34%
Ind- 29%

is that a typical sampling for florida?

Romney has been nipping at Obama's heels in that state for quite a while


pssst....just so you know, you're not techinially "allowed" to talk about party ID on this forum. It makes a lot of people quite upset (probably more their problem than anyone elses).

But since you asked, this is a bit of a Republican sample. Turnout in 2010 was even, and in '08 it was D+3. Granted, in '04 it was R+4.
Logged
LiberalJunkie
LiberalJunkie99
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 670
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2012, 09:20:31 AM »
Quote from: MorningInAmerica on October 05, 2012, 09:18:53 AM
pssst....just so you now, you're not techinially "allowed" to talk about party ID on this forum. It makes a lot of people quite upset (probably more their problem than anyone elses).

But since you asked, that is a bit of a Republican sample. Turnout in 2010 was even, and in '08 it was D+3. Granted, in '04 it was R+4.

This isn't 2004.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2012, 09:21:32 AM »
WAA is not exactly a good poll, but I'd expect Romney to win FL.
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2012, 09:21:44 AM »
Quote from: LiberalJunkie99 on October 05, 2012, 09:20:31 AM
Quote from: MorningInAmerica on October 05, 2012, 09:18:53 AM
pssst....just so you now, you're not techinially "allowed" to talk about party ID on this forum. It makes a lot of people quite upset (probably more their problem than anyone elses).

But since you asked, that is a bit of a Republican sample. Turnout in 2010 was even, and in '08 it was D+3. Granted, in '04 it was R+4.

This isn't 2004.

Who said it was?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2012, 09:59:34 AM »
Database Entry: https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=1220121004116
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2012, 10:02:03 AM »
Don't talk about party ID you idiots. Jesus.

WeAskAmerica's not a very good pollster, but it's entirely possibly Romney's got a debate bounce.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,836
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2012, 10:04:55 AM »
Looks like someone is trying TOO hard to establish a "Mitt SURGES!!!" narrative today.
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2012, 10:09:17 AM »
Quote from: MorningInAmerica on October 05, 2012, 09:18:53 AM
Quote from: dirks on October 05, 2012, 09:16:15 AM
Republicans - 38%
Dems- -34%
Ind- 29%

is that a typical sampling for florida?

Romney has been nipping at Obama's heels in that state for quite a while


pssst....just so you know, you're not techinially "allowed" to talk about party ID on this forum. It makes a lot of people quite upset (probably more their problem than anyone elses).

But since you asked, this is a bit of a Republican sample. Turnout in 2010 was even, and in '08 it was D+3. Granted, in '04 it was R+4.

Hahaha... See what I mean, dirks?


Quote from: Oakvale on October 05, 2012, 10:02:03 AM

Don't talk about party ID you idiots. Jesus.


...and he thinks we're the idiots. Btw, so glad you're back, Oakvale Wink.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2012, 10:29:07 AM »
Quote from: MorningInAmerica on October 05, 2012, 10:09:17 AM
Quote from: MorningInAmerica on October 05, 2012, 09:18:53 AM
Quote from: dirks on October 05, 2012, 09:16:15 AM
Republicans - 38%
Dems- -34%
Ind- 29%

is that a typical sampling for florida?

Romney has been nipping at Obama's heels in that state for quite a while


pssst....just so you know, you're not techinially "allowed" to talk about party ID on this forum. It makes a lot of people quite upset (probably more their problem than anyone elses).

But since you asked, this is a bit of a Republican sample. Turnout in 2010 was even, and in '08 it was D+3. Granted, in '04 it was R+4.

Hahaha... See what I mean, dirks?


Quote from: Oakvale on October 05, 2012, 10:02:03 AM

Don't talk about party ID you idiots. Jesus.


...and he thinks we're the idiots. Btw, so glad you're back, Oakvale Wink.

Good to be here! Tongue
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2012, 11:21:55 AM »
WAA and Rass are working overdrive to show a Mitt bounce it looks like. Let's wait for some real polling firms.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2012, 11:48:55 AM »
I have a hard time believing Mitt is leading in all three (FL, OH, VA), but at least this will give Romney some positive news and help with fundraising - polling the past few weeks has looked grim for him.
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2012, 11:59:18 AM »
I know the Dems here normally don't want to talk about Party ID... but this party ID is too favorable to the GOP.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2012, 01:45:20 PM »
More people are probably calling themselves Republicans right now because they're enthusiastic about Romney's debate performance and the extremely glowing press coverage of it. As JJ loves to say, it'll probably be "ephemeral".
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2012, 02:40:53 PM »
When a candidate gets a bounce, so does the ID of his party.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2012, 02:46:20 PM »
the WAA and Ras polls have moved OH back to swing from lean Obama on RCP, although Obama's overall avg% stayed the same at 49%.

Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,768
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2012, 03:51:02 PM »
Quote from: Reds4 on October 05, 2012, 11:59:18 AM
I know the Dems here normally don't want to talk about Party ID... but this party ID is too favorable to the GOP.

Party ID is meaningless regardless of who it "favours".
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2012, 03:55:37 PM »
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 05, 2012, 01:45:20 PM
More people are probably calling themselves Republicans right now because they're enthusiastic about Romney's debate performance and the extremely glowing press coverage of it. As JJ loves to say, it'll probably be "ephemeral".

It might be.

I'm very skeptical about Ohio.  NC and FL were trending Romney prior to the debate.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2012, 04:16:21 PM »
WAA is not the gold standard of polling (who ?) and sample too republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 14 queries.