IL-12, 13, 17: Republicans poised to sweep all downstate districts.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:55:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 House Election Polls
  IL-12, 13, 17: Republicans poised to sweep all downstate districts.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IL-12, 13, 17: Republicans poised to sweep all downstate districts.  (Read 858 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 05, 2012, 05:38:49 PM »

From Weaskamerica:



IL-12:

Plummer 44
Eynart 40

Romney 48
Obama 45


IL-13:

Davis 44
Gill 40

Romney 48
Obama 45


IL-17:

Schilling 48
Bustos 44

Romney 44
Obama 48





Great news! This will certainly be a lesson for a century on how to break a vicious gerrymander.
Logged
knyphausen
Rookie
**
Posts: 16


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2012, 05:44:14 PM »

WAA is not a very credible pollster...
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2012, 05:55:27 PM »

WAA is not a very credible pollster...

Well, they're not the worst.

The Presidential toplines look pretty Republican-friendly to me though.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2012, 06:02:31 PM »


The Presidential toplines look pretty Republican-friendly to me though.

Is it just me, or has Illinois swung pretty heavily R this year? Not that it matters presidentially, but Quinn and the Legislature are pretty unpopular, and it could have downballot effects (similar to what's going on in CT).
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2012, 06:20:26 PM »


The Presidential toplines look pretty Republican-friendly to me though.

Is it just me, or has Illinois swung pretty heavily R this year? Not that it matters presidentially, but Quinn and the Legislature are pretty unpopular, and it could have downballot effects (similar to what's going on in CT).

Illinois Democrats got greedy with these 3 districts. Perhaps if they lose all 3 they will do a redistricting in 2013 to only target 2.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2012, 08:44:46 PM »

WAAaaaa
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,801


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2012, 09:29:13 PM »


The Presidential toplines look pretty Republican-friendly to me though.

Is it just me, or has Illinois swung pretty heavily R this year? Not that it matters presidentially, but Quinn and the Legislature are pretty unpopular, and it could have downballot effects (similar to what's going on in CT).

Illinois Democrats got greedy with these 3 districts. Perhaps if they lose all 3 they will do a redistricting in 2013 to only target 2.

Had they known that Costello was retiring and that Gill would be a nominee again I think they would have been tempted to do that last year. The DCCC pushed to make IL the place to compensate for GOP maps elsewhere and they maximized their risk downstate to do that. IL-12 was only D+2 and IL-13 D+1 and that includes the Obama home state effect of 2008. A more solid D district could have been set up instead.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 14 queries.