Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 23, 2017, 05:33:50 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your Ballot in the 2016 Mock Election

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash, ModStasi)
| | |-+  Is the papacy an elective monarchy or a presidency for life?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Is the papacy an elective monarchy or a presidency for life?
Elective monarchy   -25 (78.1%)
Presidency for life   -7 (21.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Is the papacy an elective monarchy or a presidency for life?  (Read 947 times)
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15514


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91

View Profile
« on: October 05, 2012, 10:58:47 pm »
Ignore

Of course, the proper answer is "neither- it's a sui generis post", but if you had to compare to something, would it be one or the other? Yes, the pope might have worn a crown, robes, and carries an ordinal, but if Obama wore a crown and was known as "His Elective Majesty, President Barack I", would it really be any different. The papacy today is a post elected from one's fellows, many of which come from ordinary backgrounds and rose to their position through a process accessible by any man, not through heredity as many other elective monarchies are/were (HRE, Malaysia). The pope today is far more "presidential" in his role- leading an organization actively- than most monarchs.
Logged

The world is becoming globalized, but cosmopolitanism is being hijacked by the Davos Man. What choice is left besides nationalism? The thought is terrifying, to be honest.

I just hope Trump doesn't turn into some kind of Berlusconi-esque Teflon man.
AMA IL TUO PRESIDENTE!
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 44236
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2012, 12:25:58 am »
Ignore

The difference is in their moral status. The President is a magistrate chosen by a group of people to perform duties on their behalf. The Monarch is considered as an individual placed above the others by a transcendent legitimacy. Thus, papacy clearly falls into the monarchic category.
Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10250
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2012, 02:07:22 pm »
Ignore

The difference is in their moral status. The President is a magistrate chosen by a group of people to perform duties on their behalf. The Monarch is considered as an individual placed above the others by a transcendent legitimacy. Thus, papacy clearly falls into the monarchic category.
This
Logged

Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39239
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2012, 06:38:01 pm »
Ignore

Yes, the pope might have worn a crown, robes, and carries an ordinal, but if Obama wore a crown and was known as "His Elective Majesty, President Barack I", would it really be any different.

In that case, he would be a monarch.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12659
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2012, 06:45:19 pm »
Ignore

While like other royals it has allowed itself surprisingly(?) comfortably into the contemporary epoch, the papacy still fundamentally remains a medieval and renaissance-epoch institution in its vision of sovereignty (though out of politics it has to quiet down that universalism stuff) so therefore unsurprisingly it can't be remotely considered republican in any way. One only has to look at the ridiculous way (with the ceremony included too) the pope is selected to see that.
Logged



Quote
Keith R Laws ‏@Keith_Laws  Feb 4
As I have noted before 'paradigm shift' is an anagram of 'grasp dim faith'
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15514


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2012, 08:15:13 pm »
Ignore

Yes, the pope might have worn a crown, robes, and carries an ordinal, but if Obama wore a crown and was known as "His Elective Majesty, President Barack I", would it really be any different.

In that case, he would be a monarch.

But are those just not just superficial trappings? Nicolae Ceausescu carried a sceptre. Did that mean Ceausescu was a monarch?
Logged

The world is becoming globalized, but cosmopolitanism is being hijacked by the Davos Man. What choice is left besides nationalism? The thought is terrifying, to be honest.

I just hope Trump doesn't turn into some kind of Berlusconi-esque Teflon man.
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12972


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2012, 08:18:39 pm »
Ignore

A form of elective monarchy for life, elected by the College of Cardinals, closer to an absolute monarch than a constitutional monarch.
Logged



Special Boy
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16184
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2012, 12:38:44 pm »
Ignore

How does the Office of the Papacy actually compare to the  office of the Holy Roman Emperor?
Wasn't the Holy Roman Emperor basically elected by a peerage to be some sort of divine arbiter of power?
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines