Why does Rimney get to change his position every time he makes an appearance but if Obama just reminds people of what he proposed in writing over a year ago it "reeks of desperation"? Its not in dispute that he needs to do something to recover from the debate. There are lots of changes that could be made to Obamacare without "throwing it away".
Yes, except there is one big difference: Obama has been POTUS all this time. Where was he? Mittens as a candidate without any power to do anything whatsoever, has certainly changed his tone, but he is hardly offering brand new initiatives.
Having said that, Mittens apparently reads my posts, because he did tack through his campaign staff yesterday, who revealed/leaked that if his tax rate cut ideas are not offset by deduction rollbacks, and thus are in conflict with the idea that government revenues should not be reduced, then the rate cuts will have to be shaved back, because the revenue neutral aspect is the top priority because mitigating the deficit is the top priority.
