Which party's electoral/demographic coalition is more unstable? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:10:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Which party's electoral/demographic coalition is more unstable? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which party's electoral/demographic coalition is more unstable?
#1
Democrats'
 
#2
Republicans'
 
#3
Don't know
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Which party's electoral/demographic coalition is more unstable?  (Read 1538 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,502
United States


« on: October 13, 2012, 01:51:10 PM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_%28United_States%29#Voter_base

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29#Voter_base

Both parties are broad coalitions of demographics with often divergent interests. Both parties have intra-party divisions on issues of economics, trade, foreign policy, social programs, and the size and purpose of government. In recent years, social issues have been more important for partisan polarization than other issues.

That being said, which party has a more unstable electoral/demographic coalition, in your view?
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,502
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2012, 06:52:50 PM »
« Edited: October 18, 2012, 06:56:13 PM by Progressive Realist »

Most of the people who bankroll the GOP have absolutely nothing in common (politically or culturally) with the typical Republican voter- and especially not the typical grassroots activist.      

I actually am not too sure about that. There are a good number of wealthy individuals who have bankrolled both the Christian Right and the Tea Party movement. Some of these people have quite right-wing views not just on economics (obviously)  but also on social policy. The Chick-Fil-A CEO is just one example-there are a number of others on the Forbes 400 who have bankrolled the Christian Right.

Also, re: the typical grassroots activist-those people, from what I understand, tend to be more affluent and educated than the typical Republican voter (who is already of higher socioeconomic status than the typical American).

I've noticed that almost all of the Tea Party politicians and candidates in the Republican Party (and there is a lot of overlap with the Christian Right there) are, if not quite wealthy themselves (usually, from ownership of one or more businesses), are at least solidly "middle-class" in both economic reality and political attitudes.

I'm just not totally convinced that there is this really big cultural/political/economic divide between the voters, the activists, and the big money donors, in general, on the Republican side. The bigger divide within the Republican Party, at this point, may be between the corporate establishment types and the self-employed/small business/middle-and-lower manager types-the latter being more prone to grass-roots political activism, I suspect.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.