Chris Matthews struggles with Constitutional Rights 101.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:57:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Chris Matthews struggles with Constitutional Rights 101.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Chris Matthews struggles with Constitutional Rights 101.  (Read 277 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 18, 2012, 10:42:18 PM »

There are no words.

http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/chris-matthews-is-challenging-obama-unconstitutional/article/2511086
Logged
Spanish Moss
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2012, 10:57:31 PM »

I'd be interested to see the full clip of this with the entire conversation in context.
Logged
Cliffy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 593
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2012, 11:03:05 PM »

Mathews is a mouth breathing moron, there isn't a polite way to put it either.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2012, 11:30:58 PM »

Eh, I don't think he was saying it's unconstitutional to talk over the President, just that it's rude, and that he should show deferrence to the constitutionally-designated head of state. I don't really agree, but that's my interpretation of what he said.
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2012, 11:34:05 PM »

Eh, I don't think he was saying it's unconstitutional to talk over the President, just that it's rude, and that he should show deferrence to the constitutionally-designated head of state. I don't really agree, but that's my interpretation of what he said.

I got that too. I didn't feel like he was saying that it is unconstitutional it's just the usual "respect the President" whining.

I also feel this should be moved to the General forum.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 14 queries.