PA/NJ, Quinnipiac: Obama in the lead
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:57:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PA/NJ, Quinnipiac: Obama in the lead
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA/NJ, Quinnipiac: Obama in the lead  (Read 920 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:09:07 AM »

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/pennsylvania/release-detail?ReleaseID=1807


http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/new-jersey/release-detail?ReleaseID=1806


NJ

Romney 43
Obama 51


PA

Romney 46
Obama 50



Not too shabby. Romney has made major gains with whites and these states are voting at 2004 levels.

Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2012, 07:13:24 AM »

In recent elections, New Jersey has always showed an occasional sign that it may be a battleground state, but it never comes it anything other than a solid Democratic win. I guess that will be the case this year too.

As for Pennsylvania, well, I think Romney might be regretting not contesting it.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2012, 07:18:30 AM »

Most people expected NJ to be a 10-14% win... this is relatively consistent with that.

I don't really understand why Romney didn't compete in PA... having said that, I'd be surprised if Romney hasn't hit his ceiling.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2012, 07:50:00 AM »

I have a problem with Quinnipiac in PA.  Still, Obama's ground game is not as strong as it was in 2008.  I did see some SEIU people, but not as many as then.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2012, 07:56:52 AM »

New Poll: Pennsylvania President by Quinnipiac University on 2012-10-14

Summary: D: 50%, R: 46%, I: 1%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
dirks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2012, 07:57:25 AM »
« Edited: October 16, 2012, 08:04:14 AM by dirks »

yep, nj is starting to look a lot like Bush's 2004 totals. If Romney creeps any closer in NJ (or if Obama dips below 50% here) the President may be forced to defend it

It will be interesting to poll NJ again in a week to see if Mitt is within 6
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2012, 07:59:47 AM »

New Poll: New Jersey President by Quinnipiac University on 2012-10-14

Summary: D: 51%, R: 43%, I: 1%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,054
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2012, 08:48:59 AM »

The significance of these polls, in tandem with CA where the Obama dominance is waning somewhat,  is that they increase the odds that Mittens will lead in the popular vote while losing the electoral college. Thank you.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2012, 09:14:01 AM »

yep, nj is starting to look a lot like Bush's 2004 totals. If Romney creeps any closer in NJ (or if Obama dips below 50% here) the President may be forced to defend it

It will be interesting to poll NJ again in a week to see if Mitt is within 6

Obama could have to shift resources to PA/NJ, and deploy Biden here.

It would take resources out of OH and the Heartland in general. 
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2012, 09:34:06 AM »

NJ is fool's gold, but Romney could get 45% or so there before it's all said and done. Obama shouldn't have to spend any money there. PA is about the same way. I think any money Romney dumps in there will be a bad investment.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2012, 10:13:57 AM »

The significance of these polls, in tandem with CA where the Obama dominance is waning somewhat,  is that they increase the odds that Mittens will lead in the popular vote while losing the electoral college. Thank you.

Indeed.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,972


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2012, 10:17:40 AM »

Obama could have to shift resources to PA/NJ, and deploy Biden here.

It would take resources out of OH and the Heartland in general. 

Mm-hmm.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,065
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2012, 10:23:51 AM »

Obama could have to shift resources to PA/NJ, and deploy Biden here.

It would take resources out of OH and the Heartland in general. 

Mm-hmm.

J.J. you can't believe this.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2012, 02:16:04 PM »

Romney advisor told Politco.com they arent going to change strategy and move resources into either MI or PA. I think Republicans have learned their lesson. These states arent voting GOP before OH, CO, IA, NH or even WI so what's the point?

That being said, if Obama is only ahead in PA by 4, then he is not ahead in OH by 5
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,199
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2012, 03:57:45 PM »

Romney advisor told Politco.com they arent going to change strategy and move resources into either MI or PA. I think Republicans have learned their lesson. These states arent voting GOP before OH, CO, IA, NH or even WI so what's the point?

That being said, if Obama is only ahead in PA by 4, then he is not ahead in OH by 5

That is true, looking at trends, Romney should be at least tied or slightly ahead in OH, IA, NH and CO. That is if He is truly only down by four-ish in PA.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 14 queries.