Sarah Palin: "Shuck and jive ends with Benghazi lives" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:21:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Sarah Palin: "Shuck and jive ends with Benghazi lives" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sarah Palin: "Shuck and jive ends with Benghazi lives"  (Read 2861 times)
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

« on: October 25, 2012, 12:06:40 PM »

The term "shuck and jive" has been non racial for 40 to 50 years, but when Sarah Palin uses it... O' boy we're back in the 1850's all of a sudden. 

Weird how "jive talker" is a perfect description of Obama, but this phrase is horribly off key.     
Logged
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2012, 10:04:04 AM »

It's called observing Republican rhetoric and how they've reacted to the first black president in a histrionic and often racist way. It's not just about his policies at all! Remember, he's a lazy, drug dealing, terrorist sympathizing, Muslim socialist who wants to enslave whites and probably isn't a real American.

And "shuck and jive" is just another example of the blatant racism that Republicans pretend is nothing when people call it out. It is still a racial term to most people, Sarah Palin knows it, and she loves when people defend her by saying it isn't racist because it gives cover to the fact that she was intentionally using coded language to embolden the actual racists who follow her. And that's a fact, jack. Smiley

Yes Sarah Palin is both stupid AND an evil genius coding secret messages that all whites know the meaning of AND have no idea what they mean/that they exist.  She also put hidden messages in Zeppelin albums that you can hear when you play them backwards.   
Logged
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2012, 12:03:17 PM »

This woman could have been Vice-President. Says it all really.

I would agree if you admitted that Obama and Biden are both the same or worse.  Biden is clearly insane and BO has revealed himself to be not just a lightweight, but also not at all bright.  Palin is also more qualified than Obama, which should either qualify her for VP or disqualify BO from the presidency. 
Logged
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2012, 08:37:53 AM »

I just wanted you to reconcile your "foolish" looking contradictions into coherence.  That doesn't make me "look foolish". 

As for qualifications, you could say you don't care about them or they aren't important, but you can NOT deny that Palin has more than Obama.  She more than successfully ran 3-4 enterprises, while Obama has never run a single enterprise successfully.  Perhaps he did a good job at the Harvard Law Review, but he is secretive about that and thus we don't really know, thus hard to judge.  Obama does have reading skills and probably writing skills, but Palin has those as well, so that is a wash.  Neither is bright, but BO went to more prestigious schools...  So, once again we are back to Obama's college background as a qualification for POTUS.  His econ 101 class is really paying off.       
Logged
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2012, 09:08:04 AM »


Dude you only have to hear them speak for a couple of minutes to know she's a dope and he's of at least a bit above average intelligence.

That's dialect bias.  You can put a clip of Palin making a good point and a clip of Obama making a stupid point next to each other and Obama will sound/look more intelligent.  Most people and the media will have that impression, which is why I wouldn't support Palin -- if I personally liked her as a candidate in the first place (which I don't).  So, once you get beyond a baseless impression you would have to weigh each body of work.  The similarities are quite amazing...
both:
think poorly on their feet
have poor command of most issues
are so dependent on slogans you wonder if they have anything behind the rhetoric (Palin probably has a more realistic "vision", but mostly because she chose better people to copy from)
Get sidetracked into small pointless issues, making themselves smaller and smaller
etc etc

Palin at least has a track record of good decision making skills on her side.  You can't get around that, other than pretending it doesn't count or doesn't exist or something.   
         
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.