dan quayle vs. bill clinton 1996?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:59:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  dan quayle vs. bill clinton 1996?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: dan quayle vs. bill clinton 1996?  (Read 2211 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 03, 2005, 08:25:45 PM »
if quayle would have won the republican nomination in 1996, how badly would he have been beaten?

dan quayle/pete domenici (R)
bill clinton/al gore (D)
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2005, 08:38:54 PM »
Change ND, GA, SC, NC, and MT.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2005, 08:43:14 PM »
I don't get what's with people and NE-3. It's the 70%+ Republican one, folks! Wink + Tongue
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2005, 07:39:23 PM »
GA went to Clinton in 1996.
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2005, 08:12:27 PM »
No it didn't. You're thinking 1992.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2005, 10:50:55 PM »

Dole won GA by 1.25 in 1996, (47.01-45.84)
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2005, 02:10:00 AM »
My map:



Clinton wins 419-119.
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2005, 02:11:43 AM »
Why not the Carolinas? They were very close to begin with.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2005, 02:14:20 AM »
Quote from: Cashcow on February 05, 2005, 02:11:43 AM
Why not the Carolinas? They were very close to begin with.

Dole carried North Carolina by 5 points and South Carolina by 6; I don't think Clinton would have quite been able to swing those states against Quayle. NC would be very close, but in SC the white vote is too solidly Republican for a Democrat to win.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2005, 10:11:43 AM »
i agree that quayle would have been a terrible candidate.  but i do think he would have done pretty well in the south.  you all are forgetting how popular he was with the religious right.

he is one of them!
Logged
went that way
Rookie
**
Posts: 54


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2005, 09:15:15 AM »
Clinton would win.
Quayle would be better if he could speak with better grammer.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.