Yougov final national survey: O+2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:58:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Yougov final national survey: O+2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Yougov final national survey: O+2  (Read 689 times)
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


« on: November 04, 2012, 04:09:30 PM »

Obama 48.5
Romney 46.5
(yes, yes, decimals, but in fairness n=36472 likely voters)
Conducted Oct. 31- Nov. 3.

http://cdn.yougov.com/r/1/ygTabs_november_likelyvoters_National.pdf
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 05:50:53 PM »

Obama 48.5
Romney 46.5
(yes, yes, decimals, but in fairness n=36472 likely voters)
Conducted Oct. 31- Nov. 3.

http://cdn.yougov.com/r/1/ygTabs_november_likelyvoters_National.pdf
Internet poll. I could be a black woman from Ohio that reads the New York Times and loves Obama with and they'd have no clue.
Fair enough, you don't like internet polls. The fact remains that they were amongst the most accurate of pollsters in 2010, coming in just a couple of tenths of a point behind Q-Pac and SUSA. Rasmussen's average error (5.9%), was two and half points worse than Yougov, whose average error was 3.5%.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/rasmussen-polls-were-biased-and-inaccurate-quinnipiac-surveyusa-performed-strongly/
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 08:49:20 PM »

Obama 48.5
Romney 46.5
(yes, yes, decimals, but in fairness n=36472 likely voters)
Conducted Oct. 31- Nov. 3.

http://cdn.yougov.com/r/1/ygTabs_november_likelyvoters_National.pdf
Internet poll. I could be a black woman from Ohio that reads the New York Times and loves Obama with and they'd have no clue.
Fair enough, you don't like internet polls. The fact remains that they were amongst the most accurate of pollsters in 2010, coming in just a couple of tenths of a point behind Q-Pac and SUSA. Rasmussen's average error (5.9%), was two and half points worse than Yougov, whose average error was 3.5%.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/rasmussen-polls-were-biased-and-inaccurate-quinnipiac-surveyusa-performed-strongly/
And who was the most accurate in 2008?

There was quite a lot of consensus right around the end in 2008. Yougov and Rasmussen both had Obama up 6 in their final poll, vs. the actual PV result of Obama +7.27. The week prior, Yougov had had Obama up 7, while Ras had him up 5.
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/pollster_accuracy_and_the_nati.php?nr=1
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.