Private accounts: The dumbest thing ever (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:26:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Private accounts: The dumbest thing ever (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Private accounts: The dumbest thing ever  (Read 2376 times)
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« on: February 09, 2005, 03:41:42 PM »

The federal government has collected trillions of dollars in taxes over the years and what do they have to show for it?... A $7 trillion dollar debt!  Possible they can achieve such spectacular success with your retirement money as well.  Or maybe you could do better on your own.



Maybe, maybe not.

But I just think the 4% thing is stupid...the only real point of it is to actually speed up the point at which social security goes bankrupt, so the Republicans have an excuse to dismantle it.

Either leave it alone, or fully privatize it. The 4% deal is misleading.

Fully privatizing it seems like a better plan than leaving it under the control of politicians who only know how to tax, spend and increase the debt. But making the transition to a private system is a huge problem because the government has promised trillions of dollars to people who are currently retired or about to retire. Those people were forced to put thousands of their hard earned dollars into the system and now expect to get something back, but the government has already spent the money and has nothing to give back. The only way they can be repaid is by taxing current wage earners, more deficit spending, or possibly selling off some of the governments assets. Personally the third option seems worthy of investigation to me. But it looks like Bush's plan is to make a gradual transition. That probably won't solve the central problem either but I applaud his efforts to focus attention on the problem and get the discussion going.

I gather your plan would be to eliminate the cap on income subject to SS tax. That would raise revenues, although I don't know if it would be enough to cover the shortfall or not. But thats just another plan for raising taxes. Its just a matter of someone else paying them.

It's a matter of making the tax fair for everyone.

What's 'fair' is a rather subjective matter.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.