Let the Eagle Soar from Sea to Sea
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 07:59:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Let the Eagle Soar from Sea to Sea
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Let the Eagle Soar from Sea to Sea  (Read 10007 times)
Archangel_Mikey
King Michael
Rookie
**
Posts: 104


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 14, 2005, 06:21:57 PM »

1832

 

Pres. William Clark/VP William Wilkins (Dem.-incumbent): 247 EV, 58.76% PV
William Wirt/Amos Ellmaker (An. Mas.): 27 EV, 23.53% PV
Willie Magnum/John Sergeant (Rep.): 13 EV, 17.71% PV

1832 was the second time that a presidential candidate ran relatively unopposed.  The Federalist Party had collapsed in on its self had been replaced by the disunited National Republican Party under Willie Magnum.  Magnum won only one complete state.  The Anti-Masonic Party under William Wirt did way much better than Magnum did.

The result in this election was the foundation of the Whig Party, named after the opposition in the British Parliament in the 18th century.  The Whig Party was a coalition of states’ right supporters, northern merchants, and others.  The Anti-Masonic Party was renamed the American Party and continued to be a powerful third party.

Québec was admitted to the Union.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2005, 04:27:53 AM »

Ironclads were commissioned in the U.S. Navy during Adams’s term.

1822 ironclads!!!!

OK, this has turned into fantasy.   Practical iron-clads require screw propellers and those weren't developed until 1838.  If the incident aboard the USS Princeton in 1843 is butterflied away, I could see an experimental ironclad maybe by 1850.  Several more butterflies might bring an ironclad into being by 1840, but not in 1822.

Robert Fullton had laid down his own ironclad warship in 1809.  It was never completed.  And why would an ironclad warship need a propeller.  A paddlewheel would work just as good.

Paddle wheels are horribly vulerable to enemy fire as it is impractical to armor all of that exposed machinery.  By contrast, with a propellor you can place the machinery below the waterline where it is safe from enemy gunfire.  In addition, screws have a higher power to weight ratio than do paddles which is also important for armored war ships.  Finally, there is the fact that paddlewheel vessels are less seaworthy than either sailing or prop-driven vessels.
The advantage of paddlewheels is that they can handle poorly charted shallow draft rivers much beter than screw propellors, but absent a Civil War the US doesn't need a riverine ironclad.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 18, 2005, 04:33:13 AM »


Why not simply call it Canada?  You've had the US conquer the territory well before the split into Lower and Upper Canada occurred (modern Ontario and Quebec).
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2005, 09:17:01 PM »

For some reason this title reminds me of this  strange happening:

http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2002/02/25/ashcroft.sings.wbtv.med.html
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.