2008 Predictions... just for the hell of it.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:23:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 Predictions... just for the hell of it.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8
Author Topic: 2008 Predictions... just for the hell of it.  (Read 16356 times)
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 12, 2005, 01:20:40 AM »
« edited: February 12, 2005, 02:04:22 AM by nickshepDEM »

I know its a while off, but just for the hell of it lets do some SERIOUS predictions so we can look back 4 years from now, bump the thread, and say damn I was close or damn I was way off. (assuming we are still members)

*Pick a Presidential Candidate and Vice Presidential candidate for both parites and make a map.*

*President (both party's)
*Vice President (both party's)
*A map
*And if you want a little scenario type statement.


(P.S. Please, Please, Please only make ONE so the page doesnt get to cluttered with a bunch of bullsh**t maps.)
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2005, 01:41:23 AM »

Sounds good. Smiley
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2005, 01:42:02 AM »

1. George Allen (R-VA) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
2. Bill Frist (R-TN) and Evan Bayh (D-IN)

3.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2005, 02:02:16 AM »



Democrat:  Mark Warner/Russ Feingold
Republican:  Bill Frist/Tim Pawlenty

Results:  Warner/Feingold win 332-206
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2005, 02:14:41 AM »

Republican ticket -   Rick Santorum (PA)
                                Bill Owens (CO)

Democratic ticket -   Hillary Clinton (NY)
                                Joe Biden (DE)




Santorum/Owens - 307

Clinton/Biden - 231
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2005, 02:33:28 AM »

1. George Allen (R-VA) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
2. Bill Frist (R-TN) and Evan Bayh (D-IN)

3.


He might have meant maps that are at least slightly realistic.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2005, 02:37:17 AM »
« Edited: February 12, 2005, 07:33:33 AM by nickshepDEM »

Jfern, not to be a asshole or anything, but can you edit your post so the map doesnt show up.  I dont want maps all over the place on this thread.

His map does seem a little far-fetched, but its his opinion and he could paint the whole thing blue for all I care.  But your right, the idea of this thread was to make some realistic predictions and see who was the closest to predicting the outcome 4 years from now.
Logged
Lt. Gov. Immy
Immy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 732


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2005, 05:41:28 AM »



Bayh/Richardson- 51.2% 300 EV
Hagel/Owens- 47.6% 238 EV
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2005, 12:06:25 PM »

Feingold/Richardson defeats Allen/Owens 289-249

Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2005, 12:39:27 PM »

So "realistic" that everyone picks their own side to win...
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2005, 01:00:15 PM »
« Edited: February 12, 2005, 02:25:40 PM by Jake »

Mark Sanford  (R) NC  302   53%
Rick Santorum (R) PA

Bill Richardson (D) NM 236  45%
Russ Feingold   (D) WI



Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2005, 01:23:37 PM »

Mark Sanford  (R) NC  302   53%
Rick Santorum (R) PA

Bill Richardson (D) NM 236  45%
Russ Feingold   (D) WI



Swing States will be Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Iowa, and New Hampshire

Most realistic map so far, except Richardson probably wouldn't be able to swing Arizona, imo.

I also question whether a Sanford/Santorum ticket could swing Michigan.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2005, 01:33:38 PM »
« Edited: February 12, 2005, 01:44:17 PM by ian »

Just for the record, my opinion will probably change many times regarding who will be nominated, etc, but for now this is who I educated guesstifyingly suppose will be nominated from each party

For the Republicans, Frist (TN)/Pawlenty (MN)--(good picks NickshepDEM!)
For the Democrats, Pryor (AR)/Warner (VA)



If I HAD to say who the tossups would go to, I would say all to Frist/Pawlenty.
And NH, ME, PA, NJ, OH, IA, MI, WI, NM, HI, CO, FL, and NV are all lean states.

EV Total:
258: Frist/Pawlenty - 240: Pryor/Warner - 40: tossup
or
298: Frist Pawlenty - 240: Pryor/Warner
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2005, 02:15:29 PM »
« Edited: February 12, 2005, 02:24:17 PM by nickshepDEM »

So "realistic" that everyone picks their own side to win...

Well, most probably will chose their side to win, but that doesnt mean their maps arent realistic.  When I said realistic I meant no maps like... Kucinich or Gingrich winning in an electoral sweep or something off the wall like that.  Its just for fun, its not like we are getting paid by Fox or CNN to be analyst here.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2005, 02:20:45 PM »
« Edited: February 12, 2005, 02:23:11 PM by nickshepDEM »

Ive talked to a couple people on different boards that either live in South Carolina or follow South Carolina politics and they say Sanford isnt all he is cracked up to be.  They say he hasnt done much of anything since he became Governor and the South Carolina GOP keep losing seats.  Anyone from South Carolina wanna' fill me in on how well he is doing down there?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2005, 02:29:13 PM »

Ive talked to a couple people on different boards that either live in South Carolina or follow South Carolina politics and they say Sanford isnt all he is cracked up to be.  They say he hasnt done much of anything since he became Governor and the South Carolina GOP keep losing seats.  Anyone from South Carolina wanna' fill me in on how well he is doing down there?

Ernest said he's pretty much a lock for re-election. Check out the Gubernatorial board.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2005, 05:51:17 PM »

1. George Allen (R-VA) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
2. Bill Frist (R-TN) and Evan Bayh (D-IN)

3.


He might have meant maps that are at least slightly realistic.

My map is completely realistic.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2005, 06:03:25 PM »

Democratic: Hillary Clinton/Wesley Clark
47%
237

Republican: Bill Frist/Norm Coleman
52%
301



Logged
Reignman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,236


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2005, 10:20:32 PM »



Dems: 261
GOP: 267
tossup: 10
Logged
J.R. Brown
Rutzay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 717
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2005, 02:52:15 AM »



Democratic: Al Gore/Evan Bayh
309

Republican: Bill Frist/Mitt Romney
229
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2005, 04:25:23 PM »

1:  Hillary Clinton - Bill Richardson
2:  Mitt Romney - Condi
3:



Romney:  316
Clinton:  222

Logged
Notre Dame rules!
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 777


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2005, 10:55:31 PM »

Rutzay,

Do you REALLY beleive that Gore could carry that many states after his repeated meltdowns?
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 13, 2005, 11:01:03 PM »

Rutzay,

Do you REALLY beleive that Gore could carry that many states after his repeated meltdowns?


Gore would probably carry the Kerry 2004 states minus NH and a couple others.  Hes done.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 14, 2005, 09:58:03 AM »
« Edited: February 14, 2005, 10:00:53 AM by Lewis Trondheim »

Just for the hell of it...okay, here goes.
Dem: Al Gore/Brad Henry 49.91%, 300 EVs
Rep: Dick Cheney/Bill Owens 48.81%, 238 EVs

Logged
J.R. Brown
Rutzay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 717
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2005, 11:10:31 AM »

Rutzay,

Do you REALLY beleive that Gore could carry that many states after his repeated meltdowns?


No, not REALLY, but just for the hell of it I gave it a shot. I really think Kerry has a better shot than Gore. But ya never know, some unforseen events could occur that would put Gore in the White House. I don't know what, though. I guess that's why they're unforseen. I admit that I may have been a little too hopeful with some of those state. OK, with a lot of those states.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 12 queries.