War on Drugs overreaches: What could happen in a scenario like this?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:56:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  War on Drugs overreaches: What could happen in a scenario like this?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: War on Drugs overreaches: What could happen in a scenario like this?  (Read 687 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 15, 2013, 11:16:56 AM »
« edited: February 15, 2013, 11:19:03 AM by Harder Harmonies »

Just wondering if someone with more legal knowledge could clarify, since it sounds as if the following scenario is plausible. How much is it?

Police are chasing a drug dealer on foot. The drug dealer jumps off a small overhang into a parking lot below, and on top of your car. In the process he drops a bag of coke on your car, and then keeps running. Because of this your car is seized as "evidence". Police are not required to return it or compensate you in any way for it.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2013, 12:35:16 PM »

I'm pretty sure they couldn't take your car if it just fell on top of it, especially considering they knew where it came from and could just seize the bag itself for evidence.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2013, 03:18:53 PM »

It would be tougher if he threw it into your car while he was getting away and he claimed once caught that it was your coke, not his.  Even then, it's doubtful the cops would impound your car for any longer than it took to process the evidence.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2013, 05:25:15 PM »

Just wondering if someone with more legal knowledge could clarify, since it sounds as if the following scenario is plausible. How much is it?

Police are chasing a drug dealer on foot. The drug dealer jumps off a small overhang into a parking lot below, and on top of your car. In the process he drops a bag of coke on your car, and then keeps running. Because of this your car is seized as "evidence". Police are not required to return it or compensate you in any way for it.

Something like this actually happened on 'Cops'. Two women stole a pickup truck, used drugs in it, and police permanently seized the truck from the rightful owner because of the thieves' drug use.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2013, 06:34:00 PM »

Just wondering if someone with more legal knowledge could clarify, since it sounds as if the following scenario is plausible. How much is it?

Police are chasing a drug dealer on foot. The drug dealer jumps off a small overhang into a parking lot below, and on top of your car. In the process he drops a bag of coke on your car, and then keeps running. Because of this your car is seized as "evidence". Police are not required to return it or compensate you in any way for it.

Something like this actually happened on 'Cops'. Two women stole a pickup truck, used drugs in it, and police permanently seized the truck from the rightful owner because of the thieves' drug use.

Cite?  Cops ain't exactly Law and Order. It doesn't deal with the long term consequences of what happens.  I can easily see the owner not having gotten back his vehicle by the end of the show, but getting it back the next day when the cameras weren't around. The police would want to process the vehicle for evidence, and maybe check that the vehicle was indeed stolen and not simply reported as such after the fact to hide his involvement.  Because if he lent them the vehicle, then yes it would be impoundable.

There's also the possibility that if those women had been using it as a mobile meth lab, it was too toxic to be returned until it was cleaned up. The cost of the cleanup is such that it might well be cheaper for his insurance company (assuming he had comprehensive insurance) to total the vehicle and cut him a check.

There's also the possibility that if the truck had been stolen long enough for him to get a check from the insurance company, that it would then be the company's instead of his.

Last but not least, they may have been keeping the truck as evidence in the auto theft charge, not the drug charge.

Between all the possible reasons it would be reasonable for the return of the truck to not be shown on the show and your heightened antipathy to authority in general, I'd need a cite from a reputable source before I'd accept your claim of what happened as the truth.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.