Opinion of Harry S. Truman
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 10:54:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Harry S. Truman
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: What's your Opinion of Harry S. Truman?
#1
FF
#2
HP
#3
Neutral
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Opinion of Harry S. Truman  (Read 4730 times)
Sopranos Republican
Matt from VT
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.03, S: -8.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2013, 11:35:42 AM »

I did read a biography of Truman; he was indeed a racist man, at least in his early life (though his courting of the KKK was more for political convenience than actually agreeing with them). However, he did become somewhat less racist as he aged, and of course made the first meaningful steps towards civil rights of any president post-Reconstruction. There's a reason why he faced convention opposition from Richard Russell (who was a very racist Georgia senator) and why Thurmond ran a third-party campaign.
While I do think he had some racist views early on, I really do think "he grew out of them," if you will, by the time he became president, he really seemed to fight for civil rights. As a president, one of my favorites, FF
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2013, 11:38:00 AM »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2013, 11:47:42 AM »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.

He must have forgotten that Truman integrated the military. Smiley
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 21, 2013, 11:54:51 AM »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.

He must have forgotten that Truman integrated the military. Smiley

Uh, Torie, read the talking points.....he integrated the military to speed up the slaughter of the black man.....
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 21, 2013, 12:10:58 PM »


What the hell?  I understand that all presidents are essentially serving the interests of the plutocracy/fascism, so I can understand why you'd like him, but surely he wouldn't be one of your favorites.  There are many many far more viciously right-wing ones than him.  Or is it just because he nuked Japanese?

Because it is not all about ideology, and he was solid on foreign policy, the Marshall Plan, handling the egomaniac and dangerous MacArthur (he wanted to use Nukes to end the Korean War, after the Chinese came in, and his ass was in the wringer), told the truth, was honest, had guts, and usually showed very good judgment. Sure I disagreed with some of his domestic programs. So what?

What the heck Torie?  Was that a little joke, editing my post rather than replying to it?!  Its a worthy reply, but the way you did it is totally confusing to any reader.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 21, 2013, 03:49:42 PM »


What the hell?  I understand that all presidents are essentially serving the interests of the plutocracy/fascism, so I can understand why you'd like him, but surely he wouldn't be one of your favorites.  There are many many far more viciously right-wing ones than him.  Or is it just because he nuked Japanese?



Because it is not all about ideology, and he was solid on foreign policy, the Marshall Plan, handling the egomaniac and dangerous MacArthur (he wanted to use Nukes to end the Korean War, after the Chinese came in, and his ass was in the wringer), told the truth, was honest, had guts, and usually showed very good judgment. Sure I disagreed with some of his domestic programs. So what?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 21, 2013, 03:52:44 PM »
« Edited: February 21, 2013, 05:37:32 PM by Torie »


What the hell?  I understand that all presidents are essentially serving the interests of the plutocracy/fascism, so I can understand why you'd like him, but surely he wouldn't be one of your favorites.  There are many many far more viciously right-wing ones than him.  Or is it just because he nuked Japanese?

Because it is not all about ideology, and he was solid on foreign policy, the Marshall Plan, handling the egomaniac and dangerous MacArthur (he wanted to use Nukes to end the Korean War, after the Chinese came in, and his ass was in the wringer), told the truth, was honest, had guts, and usually showed very good judgment. Sure I disagreed with some of his domestic programs. So what?

What the heck Torie?  Was that a little joke, editing my post rather than replying to it?!  Its a worthy reply, but the way you did it is totally confusing to any reader.

So sorry opebo. As a mod, I have more buttons than you on this board, and I clicked on the modify rather than the quote button. I have fixed it. Again my apologies. I would only edit a post of another ala the BK approach, to avoid infraction points or whatever maybe, or change the F word to "F," or something, and then I would give notice to the poster. I have not yet done that to date.

So if you see that ever happen in the way it did here, just assume that the old man had a senior moment, OK? Thanks.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2013, 04:27:53 PM »

Hey I had no problem with it Torie as - knowing your pride in your own prose - it had to be a simple mistake. 
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 21, 2013, 04:45:18 PM »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.

He must have forgotten that Truman integrated the military. Smiley

I didn't forget that. Truman was still a White Supremacist.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 21, 2013, 04:53:42 PM »
« Edited: February 21, 2013, 05:08:44 PM by Oldiesfreak1854 »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.

He must have forgotten that Truman integrated the military. Smiley

I didn't forget that. Truman was still a White Supremacist.
I didn't forget that either.  Truman never enforced that executive order.  Integration in the military was only enforced when Eisenhower took office.  Truman was a member of the KKK at one point.  And in a letter to Bess from 1911 he wrote this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Racism aside, I still think Truman was a pretty decent and likable guy, which is why I lean FF.
And where do you get this notion that every president before Clinton was a white supremacist?  Lincoln freed the slaves, and even if he supported colonization at one point, that was the racially progressive position of the time (and was meant to protect blacks from discrimination in America).  Nixon was a champion of civil rights throughout his political career (even as president), Ford stood up for a black football player at Michigan, and Reagan took in a black football player at Eureka College when he wasn't allowed to stay with the team at the same hotel.  Doesn't sound very white supremacist to me.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2013, 05:07:14 PM »

Truman was not in the KKK.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2013, 05:17:28 PM »

He was still a White Supremacist like all the other presidents before Clinton. (With the possible exception of JQA)

LOL.

He must have forgotten that Truman integrated the military. Smiley

I didn't forget that. Truman was still a White Supremacist.
I didn't forget that either.  Truman never enforced that executive order.  Integration in the military was only enforced when Eisenhower took office.  Truman was a member of the KKK at one point.  And in a letter to Bess from 1911 he wrote this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Racism aside, I still think Truman was a pretty decent and likable guy, which is why I lean FF.

You're quoting a letter from 1911, over 30 years before Truman became President. Have you ever consider that people tend to mature over the years? Surely, you must realize the difference between yourself at 3 and 20 Wink

As of Harry's KKK membership it's a matter of dispute. Rumor that was never proved. Hell, there were rumors Harding was once a KKK member, which is not proved conclusively either.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 24, 2013, 08:13:38 PM »

HP for atomic bombings, especially Nagasaki. If he was on "the other side", he'd no doubt be condemned as possibly the worst war criminal in history.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 24, 2013, 08:28:06 PM »

HP for atomic bombings, especially Nagasaki. If he was on "the other side", he'd no doubt be condemned as possibly the worst war criminal in history.
Yeah, but consider the alternative.  The war in the Pacific would have continued indefinitely, at a potential cost of many more lives than those lost at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  The atomic bombings, while horrible and tragic, were the right decision because they were the quickest and easiest way to end the war with Japan.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 24, 2013, 08:37:00 PM »

Good stuff
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 24, 2013, 08:39:08 PM »

Interesting (and funny) guy. Certainly of more humble origins than most U.S. Presidents.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 24, 2013, 08:49:59 PM »

He is remembered largely for his foreign policy, and his foreign policy was excellent. He is, in fact, one of my favorite Presidents (as is the case with Torie).
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 24, 2013, 08:59:25 PM »

HP for atomic bombings, especially Nagasaki. If he was on "the other side", he'd no doubt be condemned as possibly the worst war criminal in history.
Yeah, but consider the alternative.  The war in the Pacific would have continued indefinitely, at a potential cost of many more lives than those lost at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  The atomic bombings, while horrible and tragic, were the right decision because they were the quickest and easiest way to end the war with Japan.

There were three days between the bombings. Surely you could give more time for the effects to sink in (this wasn't the internet era) before going off and killing an extra 60,000+ people.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 24, 2013, 09:14:55 PM »

The bombings certainly reflect badly on Truman, but I don't think it's fair to go too much on him for that. In retrospect, there are indeed many more options that could have been taken. However, I can easily see why, at the time, the bombing might have been seen by Truman as the least worse option. We should be cautious in condemning him for this decision, since we have never faced a dilemma of this magnitude.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 24, 2013, 09:16:00 PM »

One of my favorite presidents, even though I totally disagree with the usage of the atomic bomb on Japan.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 25, 2013, 10:39:13 AM »

HP for atomic bombings, especially Nagasaki. If he was on "the other side", he'd no doubt be condemned as possibly the worst war criminal in history.

The bombings were, on the face of it, the right decision to make. Doing so prevented the senseless bloodshed that would have occurred if we had tried to invade Japan.
Logged
nolesfan2011
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.68, S: -7.48

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2013, 06:09:32 PM »

HP for messing with the New Deal legacy and pulling America right, he also messed up the Korean War.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 27, 2013, 06:21:28 PM »

HP for messing with the New Deal legacy and pulling America right, he also messed up the Korean War.

Truman tried to expand the New Deal and (vainly, but still) opposed the Congress' efforts to roll it back.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 27, 2013, 06:36:21 PM »

HP for messing with the New Deal legacy and pulling America right, he also messed up the Korean War.

Truman tried to expand the New Deal and (vainly, but still) opposed the Congress' efforts to roll it back.

Yeah, I'm not seeing what this guy's issue is.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 28, 2013, 01:15:47 AM »

HP for messing with the New Deal legacy and pulling America right, he also messed up the Korean War.

Truman didn't pull America to the right. The Fair Deal is actually to the left of the New Deal, in terms of what Truman was proposing.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 14 queries.