2004 Democratic Primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:34:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 Democratic Primary
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 59
Author Topic: 2004 Democratic Primary  (Read 439800 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #975 on: March 14, 2004, 02:08:32 PM »

Excellent post Smiley

Not a lot I can add really...

Except: I just looked at the Canadian Parliament's website (it has a huge election results archive), and I've noticed that the NDP usually come second in Ottawa Centre.
With a star candidate like Broadbent, the NDP have a good shot at picking it up in a by-election.

St-Maurice-Champlain doesn't vote Liberal... it votes Chrétien (local boy come good syndrome).
No Chrétien=probable BQ pickup.
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #976 on: March 14, 2004, 02:32:42 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2004, 02:38:01 PM by Canadian observer »

St-Maurice-Champlain doesn't vote Liberal... it votes Chrétien (local boy come good syndrome).
No Chrétien=probable BQ pickup.

Jean Chrétien didn't carry St-Maurice by great margins compared to Liberal scores in western areas of Montreal.  To compare, just look at Mont-Royal, Qc.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #977 on: March 14, 2004, 02:38:37 PM »

True... but Chrétien was just about the only Liberal who could carry St-Maurice in the 1990's
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #978 on: March 14, 2004, 02:40:34 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2004, 02:41:47 PM by Canadian observer »

True... but Chrétien was just about the only Liberal who could carry St-Maurice in the 1990's

Yes ... And being PM and Liberal leader surely helped...
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #979 on: March 14, 2004, 02:46:15 PM »

Part of the reason he didn't do well is that they saw Chretien as a traitor to Quebec. Who ever runs there as long as they have a good record and a native son (or daughter) could do well.

Siege40
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #980 on: March 14, 2004, 11:14:49 PM »
« Edited: March 15, 2004, 02:03:24 AM by Lewis Trondheim »

Obviously, before the Sponsorship Scandal, everything suggested Martin should call a vote quickly. By now, I'm not so sure anymore. I'll admit there's still a good argument that now's better than next year, but victory doesn't look a certainty now, and who knows what next year will bring?
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #981 on: March 15, 2004, 01:00:53 AM »
« Edited: March 15, 2004, 01:02:13 AM by Canadian observer »

Obviously, before the Sponsorship Scandal, everything suggested Martin should vote quickly. By now, I'm not so sure anymore. I'll admit there's still a good argument that now's better than last year, but victory doesn't look a certainty now, and who knows what next year will bring?

Yep... who knows what may happen in the future...

It was the story of a man who was minister in the Liberal cabinet government.  Not able to wait for the departure of his boss, the PM, he quit the cabinet for an indeterminate period of time.  The minister's ambition is rewarded when he won the leadership contest, that ensued the boss' resignation, and thus became PM.  His victory was hailed as a new era for the Liberals and the new PM was about to vanquish the new Conservative leader in a landslide, based on the polls.  But the former PM left many skeletons in the closet, leaving the new PM to explain and shout he knew and could do nothing about.  The explanations of the ambitious new PM could hold for only a couple of month, but they crumbled during the election campaign.  In the campaign, the Liberal leader receives his KO in the debate.  "You could've done something; you should've said no [to the PM]", told the Conservative leader to the ambitious PM.  After the debate, support for the Liberals crumbled, and the party obtained its worst results in 20 years ...

Am I telling a story on Paul Martin? No, it's the story of John Turner, former Liberal leader from 1984 to 1990, who succeeded P.E. Trudeau.
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #982 on: March 15, 2004, 09:06:02 AM »

Nicely put Canadian Observer. I think the thing that bothers me most about the Sponsership Scandal is that it was Jean Chretien, I liked Chretien a lot, he's the only PM I knew of my entire life, not to mention I just liked him. He had a certain charm, now, this will ruin his reputation in the history books for sure.

Martin should call the election asap before the inquiry finds a titbit (or timbit) of information that points to him, it's a race against time Pauly, get to it.

I just don't want to see Harper in Sussex Drive, those Alliance guys have said some really crazy right-wing stuff, like returning Canada to a unilingual country. A minority Liberal, or a joint Liberal-NDP government could be excellent, that is if the NDP are given some significant role. Or a minority NDP, despite how remote that is... sigh it's such an uphill battle for them...

Siege40

Siege40
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #983 on: March 15, 2004, 09:15:21 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #984 on: March 15, 2004, 09:25:40 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.

I wonder if the NDP find a strong issue to run on could they make it to 30% cause that could be enough to form a government or is it 40%... can't remember...

Siege40
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #985 on: March 15, 2004, 09:29:28 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.

I wonder if the NDP find a strong issue to run on could they make it to 30% cause that could be enough to form a government or is it 40%... can't remember...

Siege40
Siege40
you don't have to sign at the ens of post, it got your name near the avatar
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #986 on: March 15, 2004, 09:29:38 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.
Thankfully I can act without such constraints.
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #987 on: March 16, 2004, 12:38:41 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.

Unfortunaltely... I'm one who's trying to avoid laughing.  Sorry Wink
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #988 on: March 16, 2004, 04:39:50 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.

I wonder if the NDP find a strong issue to run on could they make it to 30% cause that could be enough to form a government or is it 40%... can't remember...

Siege40
Siege40
you don't have to sign at the ens of post, it got your name near the avatar

I guess he knows that. It's a style thing, he's not the only one to do it. So do Kevin Lamoreau (kevinstat), HoopsCubs, and Saratoga.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #989 on: March 16, 2004, 05:12:51 AM »

I'd prefer an NDP majority government. Smiley

So would I Wink But sadly I have to have some sort of sense of Reality. That or other Canadians laugh at you.

I wonder if the NDP find a strong issue to run on could they make it to 30% cause that could be enough to form a government or is it 40%... can't remember...

Siege40
Siege40
you don't have to sign at the ens of post, it got your name near the avatar

I guess he knows that. It's a style thing, he's not the only one to do it. So do Kevin Lamoreau (kevinstat), HoopsCubs, and Saratoga.
I know that he knows
still Kevin is posting long and few posts, anyway it is not a progressive thing to do (j/k)Wink
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #990 on: March 16, 2004, 05:20:14 AM »

Well, it obviously is, Natalie, as can be seen from the fact it's done by 16% of Progressives, but 0% of registered Republicans and Democrats. Smiley
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #991 on: March 16, 2004, 01:44:47 PM »

Oh, I know that it's not required... I quess I like it though, I never wondered why, just a style, if you really want me to change it in the name of Progressiveness I would.

Siege40
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #992 on: March 18, 2004, 08:05:49 AM »

www.electionprediction.com has finally started doing the Federal election.
Smiley
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #993 on: March 18, 2004, 08:10:37 AM »

www.electionprediction.com has finally started doing the Federal election.
Smiley

that's nice
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #994 on: March 19, 2004, 10:47:47 PM »

www.electionprediction.com has finally started doing the Federal election.
Smiley

cool

(I'm trying to combat my reputation for only posting long, infrequent posts Smiley )

Sincerely,

me
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #995 on: March 20, 2004, 04:20:51 AM »

www.electionprediction.com has finally started doing the Federal election.
Smiley

cool

(I'm trying to combat my reputation for only posting long, infrequent posts Smiley )

Sincerely,

me
lol
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #996 on: March 20, 2004, 05:12:10 PM »

Today's the CPC leadership contest. Here's the results, based on what I'm watching on the CPAC Channel

Stephen Harper: 12294 points
Belinda Stronach: 9501 points
Tony Clement: 2359 points
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #997 on: March 20, 2004, 05:14:57 PM »

Frank McKenna, former Liberal Premier of New Brunswick, has announced he won't seek a federal seat in the upcoming federal election.  That's bad news for Martin's Liberals, as they're scrambling to catch star candidates.  Their task has been pretty difficult since the outbreak of the Sponsorship Scandal.
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #998 on: March 20, 2004, 05:17:58 PM »

Here's an update from CTV.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Canadian observer
Rookie
**
Posts: 157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #999 on: March 20, 2004, 05:31:33 PM »

Stephen Harper has finally won the CPC leadership contest in the first ballot.

Here's the results aired on CPAC.

Stephen Harper: 15,614.7 points
Belinda Stronach: 9,922.2 points
Tony Clement: 2,663.1 points


Logged
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 59  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 12 queries.