Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:55:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog  (Read 174335 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« on: October 24, 2015, 08:29:04 PM »

Jefferson Parish coming in big for Vitter
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2015, 08:58:11 PM »

If Vitter maintains his margin in Jefferson, I can't see him not making the runoff.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2015, 09:25:12 PM »

I think AoS just majorly messed up their map.

Edit: Fixed now
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2015, 02:36:17 PM »

Is there a particular reason the Dem did so awfully in the AG race?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2015, 10:10:01 AM »

What kind of breakdown will we see among Dardenne and Angelle supporters in the runoff? Edwards needs at least 30% or so to not vote for Vitter (either vote for him or stay home) to win.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2015, 01:03:09 AM »

This is definitely good news for Edwards, but I'm still getting serious Kansas 2014 vibes from this race. Many moderate Republicans in Kansas supported Paul Davis, but it still wasn't enough.

If Vitter holds Edwards under 50% in the final polling average, he's got a shot. However, I don't see that happening.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2015, 03:10:12 PM »

^ He goes by "John Bel" as his first name.

The South is weird.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2015, 09:47:04 PM »

Okay if Louisiana votes for that absolute scumbag Vitter over the man of true integrity and honesty John Bel Edwards because OOGILY BOOGILY BROWN PEOPLE then they no longer deserve the rights and privileges of this great Union and should be ejected immediately tbh. But I do believe that at least a slim majority of Louisianans will see through Vitter's slimy and desperate tactics and make the right choice (though the South hasn't given me much faith in that as of late...).

In what world are "integrity" and "honesty" more important than policy?  I'm sure there are a lot of Louisianans who think they are.  But really, sure, Edwards is considerably more right-wing than the national Democratic Party, but he's still either identical or to the left of Vitter on literally every issue. 

I'm going to be completely honest, I'm not really sure how any well-informed individual who cares about policy can be a split ticket voter in the context of the modern party system.  We don't live in a country where there are Democrats who are more conservative than Republicans.  Above the local level, literally every Democrat is to the left of literally every Republican.  If you vote for a Democrat, you are going to get considerably more liberal policy than if you vote for a Republican.  And yet, I'm sure that there will be thousands of Louisiana conservatives who will vote for Edwards later this month.  The same way that Massachusetts and Maryland liberals elected Baker and Hogan last year. 

So if Louisiana actually elects Edwards, my question will be, do these people just care that little about policy, or are these voters really that low information?

John Bel Edwards is hardly your standard Democrat. A one-issue typically-Republican pro-life voter, for example, has every reason in the world to vote for Edwards over Vitter.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2015, 10:07:37 PM »

Fox8 calls it.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2015, 12:28:49 AM »

Swing and Trend from Vitter's last election in 2010:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2015, 01:01:47 AM »

Percent change in total vote, primary vs runoff

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2015, 01:45:11 AM »
« Edited: November 22, 2015, 01:51:55 AM by realisticidealist »

Lt. Gov map



AG map

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2015, 11:39:19 PM »

How does the run-off map compare to the jungle primary with all Democrats added vs. all Republicans added?

They're not very comparable, really. In the primary, all Dems totaled 41.61% (463,222 votes) while in the general, the Dems totaled 56.11% (646,865 votes).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.