1960 Uber-Convention/Primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:56:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1960 Uber-Convention/Primary
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: Should be interesting.
#1
Republican Nomination: President Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican-New York)
 
#2
Republican Nomination: Senator Richard M. Nixon (Republican-California)
 
#3
Republican Nomination: Former Senator George H. Bender (Republican-Ohio)
 
#4
Republican Nomination: Governor Cecil H. Underwood (Republican-West Virginia)
 
#5
Republican Convention: Mr. James M. Lloyd (Republican-South Dakota)
 
#6
Republican Nomination: Governor Nelson Rockefeller (Republican-New York)
 
#7
Republican Nomination: Senator Barry M. Goldwater (Republican-Arizona)
 
#8
Democratic Nomination: Senator John F. Kennedy (Democrat-Massachusetts)
 
#9
Democratic Nomination: Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat-Texas)
 
#10
Democratic Nomination: Governor Edmund G. "Pat" Brown, Sr. (Democrat-California)
 
#11
Democratic Nomination: Senator Hubert H. Humphrey, Jr. (Democrat-Minnesota)
 
#12
Democratic Nomination: Senator George Smathers (Democrat-Florida)
 
#13
Democratic Nomination: Senator Stuart W. Syminton (Democrat-Missouri)
 
#14
Democratic Nomination: Governor Michael V. DiSalle (Democrat-Ohio)
 
#15
Democratic Nomination: Former Governor Adlai E. Stevenson II (Democrat-Illinois)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: 1960 Uber-Convention/Primary  (Read 3934 times)
jpj1421
Rookie
**
Posts: 56


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 27, 2013, 04:49:30 PM »

HHH/Johnson
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,436
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 27, 2013, 04:53:34 PM »

HHH\Kennedy.

You kill Humphrey off and I'll stop following Tongue

I don't believe you'd do that, Cath, because it would just be too convenient. But just in case....
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,116
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 27, 2013, 04:54:20 PM »

Don't say I didn't warn you if Humphrey dies.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 27, 2013, 04:56:27 PM »

HHH
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2013, 05:30:42 PM »

Symington/Morse

Symington refused to speak in front of segregated audiences throughout his career and he was from Missouri.  Morse voted against the Gulf of Tokin Resolution.  Both men of great principle Smiley
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 27, 2013, 05:46:29 PM »

It pains me to vote against Goldwater, but... Four more years!
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,673
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 27, 2013, 06:00:44 PM »

Eisenhower/Nixon!
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 27, 2013, 06:41:54 PM »


There's no reason to drop Smith, especially when she ran in 1964.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 27, 2013, 06:44:10 PM »

Symington/Morse

Symington refused to speak in front of segregated audiences throughout his career and he was from Missouri.  Morse voted against the Gulf of Tokin Resolution.  Both men of great principle Smiley
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 27, 2013, 06:46:51 PM »

Goldwater/Underwood!
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 27, 2013, 06:52:52 PM »

Eisenhower/Smith. We can't drop a great VP!
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,673
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 27, 2013, 07:07:30 PM »


There's no reason to drop Smith, especially when she ran in 1964.

I actually believe that Margaret Chase Smith would be a great President, but somehow I have a soft spot for Nixon, despite his heavy personal flaws.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 27, 2013, 07:45:28 PM »

BTW, in case I didn't make it clear I want to keep Smith as VP.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 27, 2013, 09:23:57 PM »

Okay folks, you have asked questions, and now you shall receive answers.

On the subject of assassinations and/or presidential deaths: It is entirely dependent on surrounding circumstances. Were Lincoln to have presided over the Civil War, then yes, he would have been shot. However, he wasn't. McKinley's death wasn't the result of his policies as president, but due to the mere fact that he was president. FDR in this timeline had only three presidential terms, and didn't have a depression to tax him moreso. He was sickly for the majority of his final term, but FDR didn't die in office. In the case of whoever wins the 1960 presidential election, look at the circumstances and noted issues of the time of JFK's killing, etc. and determine whether this timeline's victor too will die.

On the subject of the Socialist Party: Daniel Hoan and other future "Sewer Socialists" negotiated the folding of the Party into the Democrats. They now comprise the Democrats' left wing.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,116
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: March 27, 2013, 09:38:05 PM »

Well, that's not much good of an answer, is it?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: March 27, 2013, 09:39:52 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: March 27, 2013, 09:43:18 PM »

Okay folks, you have asked questions, and now you shall receive answers.

On the subject of assassinations and/or presidential deaths: It is entirely dependent on surrounding circumstances. Were Lincoln to have presided over the Civil War, then yes, he would have been shot. However, he wasn't. McKinley's death wasn't the result of his policies as president, but due to the mere fact that he was president. FDR in this timeline had only three presidential terms, and didn't have a depression to tax him moreso. He was sickly for the majority of his final term, but FDR didn't die in office. In the case of whoever wins the 1960 presidential election, look at the circumstances and noted issues of the time of JFK's killing, etc. and determine whether this timeline's victor too will die.

On the subject of the Socialist Party: Daniel Hoan and other future "Sewer Socialists" negotiated the folding of the Party into the Democrats. They now comprise the Democrats' left wing.
So what about Socialist Labor and more radical parts of the party? Are they going to merge into one party and run a candidate?
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,116
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: March 27, 2013, 09:57:06 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?

Indeed it does. Humphrey for Vice-President!
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: March 27, 2013, 10:08:19 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?

Which type of Cuba theorist are you?  I know several involving Cuba.

(Personally I'll agree to several being plausible enough for the purposes of conjecture as well)
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: March 27, 2013, 10:10:47 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?

Which type of Cuba theorist are you?  I know several involving Cuba.

(Personally I'll agree to several being plausible enough for the purposes of conjecture as well)

I actually have no idea how much Cuba has or doesn't have to do with JFK's assassination. However, several of the same things are in place: the Cold War, Castro in Cuba, etc.
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: March 27, 2013, 10:13:03 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?

Which type of Cuba theorist are you?  I know several involving Cuba.

(Personally I'll agree to several being plausible enough for the purposes of conjecture as well)

I actually have no idea how much Cuba has or doesn't have to do with JFK's assassination. However, several of the same things are in place: the Cold War, Castro in Cuba, etc.

The professor I have for the History of the Vietnam War has something of a hobby of relating to us every single theory he's heard about JFK's assassination.  Most are merely amusing, but some do make you wonder...  They're good enough for TL purposes IMO most of the time.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,116
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: March 27, 2013, 10:19:55 PM »


Does the fact that Cuba still happened provide a hint?

Which type of Cuba theorist are you?  I know several involving Cuba.

(Personally I'll agree to several being plausible enough for the purposes of conjecture as well)

I actually have no idea how much Cuba has or doesn't have to do with JFK's assassination. However, several of the same things are in place: the Cold War, Castro in Cuba, etc.

The professor I have for the History of the Vietnam War has something of a hobby of relating to us every single theory he's heard about JFK's assassination.  Most are merely amusing, but some do make you wonder...  They're good enough for TL purposes IMO most of the time.

Well, if Cuba still happens, that gives Oswald more of a motive to kill the president, whomever he may be. That's why we all need to nominate HHH for VP instead of Prez.
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: March 27, 2013, 10:22:08 PM »

Personally I think Oswald was just crazy, but we'll never know for sure Unsure
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: March 27, 2013, 11:15:16 PM »

JFK/HHH if that means anything.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,157
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: March 27, 2013, 11:24:33 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2013, 11:27:58 PM by Californian Tony »

HHH!!!

So glad we'll get a 2-way matchup finally!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 13 queries.