POLITICO: No Judd
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 05:50:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  POLITICO: No Judd
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: POLITICO: No Judd  (Read 2181 times)
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 27, 2013, 04:12:36 PM »
« edited: March 27, 2013, 04:17:43 PM by Lieutenant Governor Clinton1996 »

03/27/2013
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
-Politico

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
- Senator Ashley Judd

Thank god, she had no chance at beating that Turtle.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,645
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2013, 04:14:12 PM »

In a neutral yr, we arent taking ky.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2013, 04:14:42 PM »

Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2013, 04:16:15 PM »

Aww. Better yet: McConnell gets to nuke a Dem star.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2013, 04:18:00 PM »

Aww, this would've been a fun race.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2013, 04:18:57 PM »

Devastated. Sad
Logged
seanNJ9
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 508
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2013, 04:19:38 PM »

So was the field cleared for Alison Lundergan Grimes?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2013, 04:28:26 PM »

Sad

Well, at least the Dems will now waste money there.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2013, 04:31:29 PM »

McConnell wanted to run against Judd, but even his own polling showed him up only single digit against her. You can only imagine what the other matchups looked like that he did not release.

Do not underestimate Grimes, especially since McConnell has such terrible approvals.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2013, 04:47:14 PM »

That was anticlimactic.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2013, 04:57:47 PM »

Judd might have been a great senator, but as long as the Democrats pick a candidate with no real negatives, I'll be looking forward to this election.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2013, 05:13:33 PM »

Now, we just need Grimes to commit. 
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2013, 05:21:12 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2013, 05:27:29 PM by Invisible Obama »

Local sources are saying that Grimes has spoken with the DSCC and plans to file for an exploratory committee.
Logged
ShadowRocket
cb48026
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,461


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 27, 2013, 05:26:16 PM »

It's probably for the best. If McConnell is vulnerable as the polls have suggested, we're better off running someone with chance to see it through.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2013, 06:01:58 PM »

Thank goodness!  We still probably won't pick up the seat, but maybe there's a shot.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,142
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2013, 07:04:10 PM »

Yay!! Smiley
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2013, 07:06:16 PM »

Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?
Logged
Paul Kemp
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,230
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2013, 07:09:20 PM »

Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?


Because she was a terrible candidate.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2013, 07:13:37 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2013, 07:22:22 PM by angryGreatness »

Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?


Imagine if Steve King said he wasn't running for Senate tomorrow, while Tom Latham was looking into a run.


If I were Grimes, first thing I'd do is blast a so-called fiscal conservative for wasting millions of dollars on ads against an actress who isn't even running.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2013, 09:09:02 PM »

Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?


Because she is the worst candidate possible for Kentucky. Greatness explained it better than I could (although Braley isn't half as strong as Mitch is as a candidate), but yeah.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2013, 09:09:48 PM »

Phew.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 27, 2013, 10:23:32 PM »

Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?


Because she was a terrible candidate.

It would have allowed McConnell to run against celebrity culture and "Hollyweird". McConnell has never been particularly popular, and could lose to the right candidate, even in a neutral year. He had a close call in 2008.
Logged
Benj
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 979


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 27, 2013, 10:31:50 PM »

Local sources are saying that Grimes has spoken with the DSCC and plans to file for an exploratory committee.

Presumably this is the real reason Judd isn't running.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,392
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 27, 2013, 10:50:18 PM »

Judd should still run for the Memphis district. She could definitely win there.

Also, I kind of wish they kept the guessing game a bit sooner -- it'd have been great to do a switch-a-roo with Grimes at the last possible second to throw McConnell on edge.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 27, 2013, 11:13:02 PM »

03/27/2013
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
-Politico

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
- Senator Ashley Judd

"the people &"?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 12 queries.