How would you have ruled in the preceding case?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:43:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  How would you have ruled in the preceding case?		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: How would you have ruled in the preceding case?  (Read 9134 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: September 17, 2013, 02:15:50 AM »
« edited: September 17, 2013, 02:17:43 AM by True Federalist »
I'd have concurred with Harlan's dissent, but made clear that while there was no judicial role here, Congress could act under its powers under Amendment XIV Section 2 and Article I Section 4.

Massiah v. United States
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: September 17, 2013, 10:18:14 PM »
With the majority, seems like commonsense to me as a matter of prosecution, even if you thought it shouldn't be Constitutional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiobel_v._Royal_Dutch_Petroleum_Co.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,436
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: September 17, 2013, 10:45:31 PM »
I'd have joined Breyer's concurrence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.C.C._v._Pacifica_Foundation
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: September 18, 2013, 05:27:48 AM »
I'd join Brennan's dissent.

Glass v. Louisiana
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: September 18, 2013, 10:18:08 AM »

With Brennan and Marshall's dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Major League Baseball
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.