Number of female senators after 2016 elections? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:30:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Number of female senators after 2016 elections? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Number of female senators after 2016 elections?  (Read 7236 times)
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,761
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« on: March 27, 2015, 08:57:55 PM »
« edited: March 27, 2015, 09:08:30 PM by SMilo »

I was incredibly disappointed when I saw "Number of female... by The Arizonan" and that was the post.

I was going to say much of the same as angry - Gojack was years ago. Even if Berkley wasn't corrupt (a bit subjective), Heller was a very, very good candidate. 1 case does not make a trend. People try to do the same thing with Coakley in Massachusetts. The same woman lost twice. She is horrible. That doesn't make the voters sexist.

I know legislature compositions are used to enhance that argument, but I seriously don't believe people vote for legislature by sex. The candidates as such a low level are a direct result of the parties' choices. You'd have to put the blame there rather than on voters.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,761
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2015, 10:45:32 PM »

You made a good point about Coakley. She wasn't a very good candidate. What about the 2002 gubernatorial election in which the Democrats ran a non-Coakley candidate?

$$$$$ - Not only Romney being unlimited, but O'Brien having zero because the primary was ultra-competitive, and there was no time to reload the war chest because MA has their primary at the last possible practical date.

Romney was also pro-choice. Remember when that was a thing.

And forum fave Jilly Stein didn't completely spoil it, but a woman getting 3.5% as a 3rd party candidate shows that it wasn't so much anti-woman bias.

I know Romney didn't run a good campaign at all, but he didn't in 2012 yet he got nominated for President despite massive hatred from the party base. Again, money solves a lot of problems - even the ones it creates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.