Leaks reveal secrets of the rich who hide cash offshore
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:26:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Leaks reveal secrets of the rich who hide cash offshore
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Leaks reveal secrets of the rich who hide cash offshore  (Read 1766 times)
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 04, 2013, 07:09:51 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Read more at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/03/offshore-secrets-offshore-tax-haven
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2013, 02:10:17 AM »

Tax havens should be wiped off the map.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2013, 08:08:37 AM »


Nuke them bastards Roll Eyes
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2013, 01:31:08 PM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2013, 02:34:17 PM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
How about expropriating and exiling all those found to have deposited money there?
Logged
freefair
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 759
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2013, 04:10:48 PM »
« Edited: April 06, 2013, 04:19:03 PM by freefair »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
So now nations have no right to sovereign fiscal policy?
Cannot tell if serious or trolling.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2013, 06:09:04 PM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
So now nations have no right to sovereign fiscal policy?

Nations have no inherent right to sovereignty whatsoever. The principle of national sovereignty is only justifiable through utilitarian considerations (ie, it is necessary to avoid a completely lawless world). However, it is not absolute and can be disregarded if the nation causes to big a damage to its own citizens and/or to the rest of the world.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2013, 07:49:16 PM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
So now nations have no right to sovereign fiscal policy?
Cannot tell if serious or trolling.

Serious.

And this sort of response by the lefties explains why the reactionaries were so harsh.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2013, 07:51:21 PM »

That's why you should all be concentrated into camps.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2013, 07:58:39 PM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
So now nations have no right to sovereign fiscal policy?
Cannot tell if serious or trolling.

'Nations' is an openly absurd word to use in the context of tax havens. Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with, and the rest are bizarre little relics generally comprised of about three parishes and a small county town.

Besides, tax havens are bad things. You only support them because you want to look as radical as possible. It's like people who claim to support nationalising the entire economy or whatever.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2013, 01:12:32 AM »

America has the right idea with regard to tax exiles.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2013, 11:13:15 AM »

Time for austerity for the rich.
Logged
freefair
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 759
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2013, 01:01:27 PM »

Honestly, this would be preferable.
While I agree that sovereignty is forfeit-able, it should be so in a limited range of circumstances, like genocide.
If they are not sovereign states, of course the parent nations governing institutions should take every constitutional legal measure to ensure they cannot operate as tax havens. If they are Indipendent, then that is a national matter. We could santion them but the use of force would be too far.
And I am not "trying to look radical", I'm not a radical, In fact I'm trying to form a pragmatic view. I do not actively approve of the existance of tax havens, and don't deny they do damage, but going gung-ho is crazy.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 08, 2013, 01:59:20 PM »

Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with

Which I've always found strange. Their parent countries should exercise more control.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2013, 02:08:36 PM »

Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with

Which I've always found strange. Their parent countries should exercise more control.

Say Britain exerts control shuts down all the tax haven stuff in the Caymans and BVI. They go from having a basically self-sustaining colony to one that requires mass handouts.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2013, 04:19:55 PM »

Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with

Which I've always found strange. Their parent countries should exercise more control.

He who pays the piper and all that...
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2013, 07:26:59 PM »

Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with

Which I've always found strange. Their parent countries should exercise more control.

Say Britain exerts control shuts down all the tax haven stuff in the Caymans and BVI. They go from having a basically self-sustaining colony to one that requires mass handouts.

Get rid of them. UK doesn't need random islands around the globe.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2013, 08:12:26 PM »

Three quarters of them aren't even independent countries to start with

Which I've always found strange. Their parent countries should exercise more control.

Say Britain exerts control shuts down all the tax haven stuff in the Caymans and BVI. They go from having a basically self-sustaining colony to one that requires mass handouts.

Get rid of them. UK doesn't need random islands around the globe.

I agree, but then you have a sovereign nation/tax haven instead of a colony/tax haven, which makes dealing with it even harder.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2013, 09:42:59 PM »

Just block any international recognition and help as long they refuses to compel. Small islands isolated won't last for long.
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2013, 05:00:45 PM »

Or, to circle the loop : nuke 'em. Cheesy
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2013, 08:55:01 PM »

Just block any international recognition and help as long they refuses to compel. Small islands isolated won't last for long.

I like that idea, but it presumes the elites are going to accept the loss of a tax haven without a fight.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2013, 11:32:52 AM »

I think nuclear attacks would be an overreaction, but certainly invasion and military occupation makes sense.
So now nations have no right to sovereign fiscal policy?

Nations have no inherent right to sovereignty whatsoever. The principle of national sovereignty is only justifiable through utilitarian considerations (ie, it is necessary to avoid a completely lawless world). However, it is not absolute and can be disregarded if the nation causes to big a damage to its own citizens and/or to the rest of the world.
Strongly disagree with this. A people has the right to its own country. Of course outside intervention can be justified to remove genocidal regimes, like the removal of Idi Amins and Pol Pots, but it has to be that extreme.

Some tax havens, like Vanuatu in Melanesia, are genuine nation states, but the rest should be pressured by their home government.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 15, 2013, 02:47:53 PM »

The idea that a microcountry's "people" can absolve itself from any moral responsibility toward the rest of the world is as absurd as the idea that an individual can absolve itself from any moral responsibility toward the rest of the society.
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 15, 2013, 03:58:09 PM »

^This. And Melanesia is not a nation state. You must be thinking Micronesia.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2013, 03:42:09 AM »

^This. And Melanesia is not a nation state. You must be thinking Micronesia.
I said Vanuatu in Melanesia, Melanesia being the geographical and cultural region Vanuatu is located in.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.