I quite like the idea that anyone could submit a map to the judges, which would then pick the best. It has the potential to do a lot of good (provided that the judges are impartial, of course).
That is why there are 3-judge panels for election cases. In the Texas redistricting case, if the 5th Circuit Justice had not written his dissent, the SCOTUS probably would not have stepped in, and the home-town judges would have got away with drawing the map.
The Democrats opposed intervention by neutral parties in the Texas case, and the hometown judge said we've got enough "help".