Gay vs. Christian - Jason Collins vs. Tim Tebow (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:16:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Gay vs. Christian - Jason Collins vs. Tim Tebow (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gay vs. Christian - Jason Collins vs. Tim Tebow  (Read 26934 times)
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« on: May 01, 2013, 11:08:32 AM »

The debate itself is laughable, but Jason Collins would have to swallow a penis whole on national television to equal the same amount of obtrusiveness that comes from Tebow and his religion.
Logged
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2013, 11:49:25 AM »

The main point I'm trying to get across is that if the media is to be neutral on Christianity, not for or against, it should be neutral on homosexuality, neither for nor against.

Following this logic, the media should be neutral on both civil rights issues and the KKK. Wouldn't want to be unfair to either group.
Logged
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2013, 11:53:08 AM »

The main point I'm trying to get across is that if the media is to be neutral on Christianity, not for or against, it should be neutral on homosexuality, neither for nor against.

Following this logic, the media should be neutral on both civil rights issues and the KKK. Wouldn't want to be unfair to either group.

At least allow dissenting view points without being forced to apologize.

America was designed with freedom of speech and that should be enforced and appreciated even when it comes to controversial topics like religion, politics, or sexual orientation.

You're very explicitly endorsing bigotry and discrimination against a minority group. Shame on you.
Logged
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2013, 12:05:59 PM »

The main point I'm trying to get across is that if the media is to be neutral on Christianity, not for or against, it should be neutral on homosexuality, neither for nor against.

Following this logic, the media should be neutral on both civil rights issues and the KKK. Wouldn't want to be unfair to either group.

At least allow dissenting view points without being forced to apologize.

America was designed with freedom of speech and that should be enforced and appreciated even when it comes to controversial topics like religion, politics, or sexual orientation.

You're very explicitly endorsing bigotry and discrimination against a minority group. Shame on you.

So, not applauding and embracing homosexuality is bigotry?

Thinking there is anything wrong with the "homosexual lifestyle" is, which is what Chris Broussard said. Anyone trying to empower Broussard's words or even defend his viewpoint is endorsing the spread of bigotry.
Logged
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2013, 12:10:57 PM »

I tell you one thing, Chris Broussard is on the right side of history and the right side of the future.

Troll detected.
Logged
BluegrassBlueVote
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,000
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2013, 02:18:21 PM »

Some of you liked Chris Broussard before this? The dude is an absolute joke within the sports community.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.