1992 United States Presidential Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:15:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1992 United States Presidential Election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Poll
Question: Well that was all ado about nothing. Typical.
#1
Vice President Mario Cuomo (Democrat-New York)/Senator Albert Gore, Jr. (Democrat-Tennessee)
 
#2
Former Congressman Ronald E. "Ron" Paul (Republican-Texas)/Governor John McClaughry (Republican-Vermont)
 
#3
Businessman H. Ross Perot (Independent-Texas)/Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin L. Powell (Independent-Pennsylvania)
 
#4
Dr. Mary Ruwart (Libertarian-Texas)/Mr. Richard B. Boddie (Libertarian-California)
 
#5
Activist Lenora Fulani (New Alliance-New York)/Activist Maria Elizabeth Muñoz (New Alliance-California)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 87

Author Topic: 1992 United States Presidential Election  (Read 13119 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: May 13, 2013, 06:25:54 PM »

Very sad news.

Looks like our hopes rest with Ralph Nader now.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: May 13, 2013, 07:22:16 PM »

Very sad news.

Looks like our hopes rest with Ralph Nader now.

How about a compromise? Cuomo '96 and Nader '00?
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: May 13, 2013, 07:35:05 PM »

Boring election is boring. Nader ftw.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: May 13, 2013, 07:44:02 PM »

Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: May 13, 2013, 07:49:33 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: May 13, 2013, 07:57:34 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,054
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: May 13, 2013, 08:06:26 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: May 13, 2013, 08:25:10 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!

That's always the best way to end a hegemony!
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: May 13, 2013, 08:38:10 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
You might get a token republican term or two out of it!
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: May 13, 2013, 08:51:09 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
You might get a token republican term or two out of it!

Now, now, Seatown, let's not get ahead of ourselves. We all know that Glorious Leader Herman Cain will rise up in 2012 and claim his mantle as Eternal President.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: May 14, 2013, 12:14:37 AM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
You might get a token republican term or two out of it!

Now, now, Seatown, let's not get ahead of ourselves. We all know that Glorious Leader Herman Cain will rise up in 2012 and claim his mantle as Eternal President.

Cain is running in 2000 though Smiley
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: May 14, 2013, 05:32:01 AM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
You might get a token republican term or two out of it!

Now, now, Seatown, let's not get ahead of ourselves. We all know that Glorious Leader Herman Cain will rise up in 2012 and claim his mantle as Eternal President.

Cain is running in 2000 though Smiley

Yeah, but 2000 is not his allotted time. This way, we can have two terms of Cuomo, two terms of Nader, and infinite terms of Herman Cain!
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: May 14, 2013, 10:09:26 AM »

With these results, if I lived in Cathcon's America, I would probably emigrate.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,201
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: May 14, 2013, 05:10:11 PM »
« Edited: May 14, 2013, 05:18:22 PM by Senator X »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

2004 proved Ralph Nader to be an egomaniac with delusions of grandeur, which is sad because he used to be a great man.  He's like John McCain, he lost his dignity running for President.  
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: May 15, 2013, 10:15:43 PM »

The 1992 United States Presidential Election
Whereas four years previous, Kemp had blamed Paul for his loss, Paul found himself ironically in a similar position. Despite data indicating that Perot had taken support from both sides, Republicans would be quick to blame the "other Texan" for their loss, pointing to recent near-record low Democratic popular vote margins and the fact that a unified center-right was needed to forge a path to victory. Cuomo ended up triumphing, ushering in another four years of Democratic rule.

Vice President Mario Cuomo (Democrat-New York)/Senator Albert Gore, Jr. (Democrat-Tennessee) 351 electoral votes, 39.1% of the popular vote
Former Congressman Ronald E. "Ron" Paul (Republican-Texas)/Governor John McClaughry (Republican-Vermont) 164 electoral votes, 31% of the popular vote
Businessman H. Ross Perot (Independent-Texas)/Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin L. Powell (Independent-Pennsylvania) 23 electoral votes, 25.3% of the popular vote
Activist Lenora Fulani (New Alliance-New York)/Activist Maria Elizabeth Muñoz (New Alliance-California) 0 electoral votes, 4.6% of the popular vote
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: May 16, 2013, 05:06:48 AM »

Yay!
Logged
nolesfan2011
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.68, S: -7.48

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: May 16, 2013, 08:30:39 PM »

Perot
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.