1992 United States Presidential Election

[Cobbler]

Perot.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Perot

Go team Perot!   Don't let the negative nancies get you down. 

It'll be fun to see the look on your faces when unskewedpolls.com turns out to be wrong.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

[OAM]

We're protesting the cult like atmosphere of the democratic party

[Lief 🗽]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

Yeah but Perot > Paul > Another Democratic winning, so I don't mind.

[LastVoter]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

I don't think most of us care about Democrats that much anymore, considering they are a neoliberal party at this point. We will have a chance to fix things up in 2000 with Nader though.

[Dr. Cynic]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

I don't think most of us care about Democrats that much anymore, considering they are a neoliberal party at this point. We will have a chance to fix things up in 2000 with Nader though.

I've been mad at Democratic voters since they screwed both Humphrey and Udall out of the Presidency.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

I don't think most of us care about Democrats that much anymore, considering they are a neoliberal party at this point. We will have a chance to fix things up in 2000 with Nader though.

So now Mario Cuomo is a neo-liberal

[Negusa Nagast 🚀]

Perot

Your Moderate Heroism is showing.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Why would Perot run in this scenario?

[OAM]

"Fed up with the one party state and the Republicans' inability to stop it" ?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

"Fed up with the one party state and the Republicans' inability to stop it" ?

Maybe the Republicans are now the third-party?

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Why would Perot run in this scenario?

Why would he not? Trends toward lower tariffs, failure of the Democrats to properly crack down on drugs, a bloated budget, domination of the Republicans by failures, wingnuts, and social conservatives, and all the rest.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.

I don't think most of us care about Democrats that much anymore, considering they are a neoliberal party at this point. We will have a chance to fix things up in 2000 with Nader though.

I've been mad at Democratic voters since they screwed both Humphrey and Udall out of the Presidency.

You should be mad at Socialist voters, then. After all, Sewer was the one who expressly stated his desire to punish the Democrats.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.

[Antonio the Sixth]

I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.

Wait, what?

If Paul wins, my reaction will simply be that the leftists on this game are a bunch of idiots.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.

Wait, what?

If Paul wins, my reaction will simply be that the leftists on this game are a bunch of idiots.

I never directed that at you in particular, but rather at those who pestered Cathcon on the convention.

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?

[LastVoter]

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?

Yea I remember it took us several tries to get Mr. Debs into office.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?

Read my post again. It took a few elections before Debs got in. Do you seriously think that I believe Paul is more progressive than Cuomo. If he were more progressive than Cuomo, why would I have voted for Paul?

[Antonio the Sixth]

I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.

Wait, what?

If Paul wins, my reaction will simply be that the leftists on this game are a bunch of idiots.

I never directed that at you in particular, but rather at those who pestered Cathcon on the convention.

Well, I did pester Cathcon on the convention. But since the peril caused by his handling of the convention was averted, and since I have no qualm about his handling of the general election, the point is now moot.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

When do the results come in?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?

The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?

Read my post again. It took a few elections before Debs got in. Do you seriously think that I believe Paul is more progressive than Cuomo. If he were more progressive than Cuomo, why would I have voted for Paul?

OK, now I have no idea what you're trying to say. You said the GOP was the more progressive party at the time in response to my question, correct? I'm assuming that means that you're implying that their progressiveness was what caused them to have such a hegemony, correct? That means that you are implying that progressiveness causes an un-protested hegemony, correct? Therefore, if you are implying all that I assume you are, your argument is that the Democrats are not the more progressive party at this time, which you just admitted was not true. Also, your original post did not mention Debs at all - are you saying that in fact conservatism is what leads to acceptance of a hegemony?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

When do the results come in?

Tomorrow afternoon at about 5:45 EST.