1992 United States Presidential Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:34:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1992 United States Presidential Election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well that was all ado about nothing. Typical.
#1
Vice President Mario Cuomo (Democrat-New York)/Senator Albert Gore, Jr. (Democrat-Tennessee)
 
#2
Former Congressman Ronald E. "Ron" Paul (Republican-Texas)/Governor John McClaughry (Republican-Vermont)
 
#3
Businessman H. Ross Perot (Independent-Texas)/Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin L. Powell (Independent-Pennsylvania)
 
#4
Dr. Mary Ruwart (Libertarian-Texas)/Mr. Richard B. Boddie (Libertarian-California)
 
#5
Activist Lenora Fulani (New Alliance-New York)/Activist Maria Elizabeth Muņoz (New Alliance-California)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 87

Author Topic: 1992 United States Presidential Election  (Read 13315 times)
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« on: May 10, 2013, 06:39:07 PM »

Cuomo, grudgingly. We need a strong left-wing  primary challenge in 1996, enough neoliberalism.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2013, 02:49:35 AM »

Guys, positive developments are very close, we will be able to vote for Green party in 2 elections.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2013, 05:22:04 PM »

Perot isn't getting enough support. All you guys will achieve is splitting the left vote and allowing Paul to win.
I don't think most of us care about Democrats that much anymore, considering they are a neoliberal party at this point. We will have a chance to fix things up in 2000 with Nader though.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2013, 06:25:48 PM »

Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?
The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?
Yea I remember it took us several tries to get Mr. Debs into office.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2013, 08:06:48 PM »

Actually we can vote for Nader in 1996, because of the new rules. I urge everyone on the left to unite behind his candidacy.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2013, 04:41:53 PM »

No surprises here.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2013, 07:44:02 PM »

Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2013, 08:38:10 PM »

Well, onto 1996 as it is. Really though, is all this pageantry necessary? I mean there's got to be a point where the voters just wouldn't care and assumed the outcome was predetermined and not give a damn who was president.

Oh, don't worry, I think Nader will be a force to be reckoned with in 2000 if not 1996.

Yay! The reign of the Democrats will be ended by someone who's to the left of the Democrats!
You might get a token republican term or two out of it!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.