SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Gov't Oversight and Reform (Game Reform/PC) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:36:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Gov't Oversight and Reform (Game Reform/PC) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: Gov't Oversight and Reform (Game Reform/PC)  (Read 5363 times)
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« on: May 15, 2013, 06:29:13 PM »
Pick me coach!
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2013, 07:15:40 AM »
At this point, I see little practical use for the office and would prefer to eliminate it. 
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2013, 08:48:27 AM »
« Edited: May 21, 2013, 08:50:11 AM by Senator X »
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on May 20, 2013, 04:30:11 PM
Senator Napoleon, are of the same opinion on this matter?

Is there any method that is technicaly sound to policing proxies without banning people unintentionally from participating in the game?

Is it even possible to unintentionally ban someone from participating?  Also, I'm not sure I understand the question (apologies if the second one was also only directed to Senator Napoleon).
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2013, 06:13:26 PM »
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2013, 08:09:08 AM »
Text 1
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2013, 08:51:30 AM »
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on May 31, 2013, 07:56:07 PM
Which of the four above items should we proceed with first (Topic Queue)

I added the ones from thel ast committee and then also included the Legislative Introduction Amendment as well.

Why not simply go in alphabetical order?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.