1936 - beginning of the rural urban divide?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:00:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1936 - beginning of the rural urban divide?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1936 - beginning of the rural urban divide?  (Read 1245 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 22, 2013, 12:36:06 AM »

One thing I've noticed from my CQ book. If one was to look at the election from how it would go in a tied election, the number of counties FDR wins drops dramatically. Major losses in MO, OK, NE, IA, IN, IL, NE, and SD. Is compensated for by huge pro-FDR swings in areas like Duluth, Chicago, Gary, Madison, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh etc.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2013, 05:51:32 AM »

Well, most of the rural areas that went maybe 55-45 for Roosevelt were staunchly Republican. The trend is just amplified because for the first time, the New Deal coalition comes out in full force in the cities.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,157
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2013, 08:03:36 PM »

1928?
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2013, 10:02:56 PM »
« Edited: May 22, 2013, 10:28:18 PM by freepcrusher »

so here's the information I've found as to how many votes the D presidential nominee would win in a tied election. I'll be back with more

1920 1818
1924 1883
1928 1532
1932 2080
1936 1687
1940 1593
1944 1516
1948 (not including Alabama) 1615
1952 1350
1956 1607 (blame ETB)
1960 1236
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2013, 10:46:32 PM »


Exactly.  1928 was when the cities started to go toward the Democrats.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2013, 10:15:20 AM »

It is a reflection of the growth of unionization and the the African American vote shifting from about 65-35 Republican to 65-35 Democrat.
Logged
soniquemd21921
Rookie
**
Posts: 137
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2013, 08:40:14 PM »

Mahoning County, Ohio (Youngstown) had one of the biggest pro-FDR swings. In 1932 it gave Hoover 53% of the vote, but in 1936 it gave FDR 71% of the vote. Did Youngstown have a strong local GOP machine the way Philadelphia did?
Logged
stevekamp
Rookie
**
Posts: 65
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2013, 12:34:30 AM »

Yes -- in the 1934 House election, the Ds won a net + 9 nationally, but this included a loss of 14 seats outside PA (mostly rural), wins of 13 outside PA, and a win of 11 in PA, plus a loss of Madison WI-2 to the Progressives.

In 1936, Ds went + 11 net national, but lost rural seat Kansas-4.

Starting in 1940, urban Areas were D, rural outside the south R.  Suburbs became the swing vote in the 1950s.

Big D % in urban counties started in the 1990's.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2013, 12:22:26 AM »

If you think about it, this would've been the center of the depression. More people live in cities and would've been benefited from Roosevelt's programs which would've turned cities into Democratic strongholds. In times of desperation, it doesn't take much to get large groups of people on your side. Nothing comparable has happened since to turn them around.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.