Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 25, 2014, 02:39:44 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Atlas Fantasy Elections
| |-+  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Gustaf, MasterJedi)
| | |-+  The Passing of the Constitution was NOT valid
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Passing of the Constitution was NOT valid  (Read 4010 times)
ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« on: April 03, 2004, 03:54:53 pm »
Ignore

Sorry, but it was not done by an official person. It was done by a non-office holder. This vote IS invalid. We cannot have people hijack the process. For that, what is the point of having office position?

I call for AN OFFICIAL VOTE by an OFFICIAL PERSON.

I also call for, when the vote is done,

keep it SIMPLE and not complicated.

I like the recent thread wording for the voting thread.

No campaigning within the thread. Just keep it simple.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2004, 03:56:43 pm by ShapeShifter »Logged

Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35386
United States
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2004, 03:56:20 pm »
Ignore

LOL!  It passed.  
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3698


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2004, 03:57:08 pm »
Ignore


Before we have a Constitution, no one is more official than anyone else.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20702
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2004, 03:57:36 pm »
Ignore

The only reason we let this go on, is because someone thought that somebody else OFFICIAL had approved of it.  The case is that NOBODY OFFICIAL approved of it.  Therefore this should be null & void.
Logged

ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2004, 03:58:03 pm »
Ignore

LOL!  It passed.  

No it did not. If the vote on PV was NOT official than everything else was not official.
Logged

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2004, 03:59:36 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.
Logged
ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2004, 04:00:14 pm »
Ignore

The only reason we let this go on, is because someone thought that somebody else OFFICIAL had approved of it.  The case is that NOBODY OFFICIAL approved of it.  Therefore this should be null & void.

I agree. The whole thing should be null and void. More organization should be done. Everything is a mess and chaotic. We also SHOULD NOT rush the establishment of our constitution.
Logged

Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35386
United States
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2004, 04:00:18 pm »
Ignore

I've all about had it with shapeshifter's bullsh**t.
Logged
ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2004, 04:04:35 pm »
Ignore

I've all about had it with shapeshifter's bullsh**t.

Good. I am tired of your bullshi* also.
Logged

Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56208
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2004, 04:06:16 pm »
Ignore

Your're avatar should be RI
Logged

12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20702
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2004, 04:07:08 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.


Dan voted for it because he thought that someone official had called for a vote on it.  I voted for it because I thought Dan had approved of it.


NO ONE IS OFFICIAL!?!?  Are you saying the President has no power Nick G.  Are you saying that the President was not elected?
Logged

ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2004, 04:08:37 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.


Dan voted for it because he thought that someone official had called for a vote on it.  I voted for it because I thought Dan had approved of it.


NO ONE IS OFFICIAL!?!?  Are you saying the President has no power Nick G.  Are you saying that the President was not elected?

Exactly my point. Happy to see, that this issue is not a partisan one.
Logged

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2004, 04:11:46 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.


Dan voted for it because he thought that someone official had called for a vote on it.  I voted for it because I thought Dan had approved of it.


NO ONE IS OFFICIAL!?!?  Are you saying the President has no power Nick G.  Are you saying that the President was not elected?

Exactly my point. Happy to see, that this issue is not a partisan one.

Supersoulty, which "official" approved of the presidential election? None, because there was no official. So I wonder who this "official" is who you are referring to.  Maybe his name is Nym90? Guess what.. Nym90 participated in the thread!! And his VP Harry participated in Lewis's earlier thread set up in the same way!

also, now you are saying demrep isn't offical? I would say he is official for being a member of the cabinet.

ShapeShifter-- nobody ever said it was a partisan issue. This issue is about the hypocrisy of people who first participate in something to influence the result, but then when they dont win, they go like crybabies and make up all these new excuses that were 10,000 miles away from anyone's mind while the actual vote is going on.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2004, 04:12:59 pm by Beet »Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7509


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2004, 04:14:27 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.


Dan voted for it because he thought that someone official had called for a vote on it.  I voted for it because I thought Dan had approved of it.


NO ONE IS OFFICIAL!?!?  Are you saying the President has no power Nick G.  Are you saying that the President was not elected?

Exactly my point. Happy to see, that this issue is not a partisan one.

Supersoulty, which "official" approved of the presidential election? None, because there was no official. So I wonder who this "official" is who you are referring to.  Maybe his name is Nym90? Guess what.. Nym90 participated in the thread!! And his VP Harry participated in Lewis's earlier thread set up in the same way!

ShapeShifter-- nobody ever said it was a partisan issue. This issue is about the hypocrisy of people who first participate in something to influence the result, but then when they dont win, they go like crybabies and make up all these new excuses that were 10,000 miles away from anyone's mind while the actual vote is going on.

what do you mean "when they dion't win", what is this all about, how can you win this vote?

The problem was that some of us didn't know what we were voting for exactly and several things contradicted each other.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2004, 04:18:22 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed. And I think you all knew was pv was, only JLD didnt know what it was and he didnt vote...
« Last Edit: April 03, 2004, 04:19:51 pm by Beet »Logged
ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2004, 04:20:17 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

First of all, I did not even vote ON the PV part in the FIRST un-official vote thread. I kept it blank because I foudn the whole thing confusing.
Logged

JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7509


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2004, 04:20:37 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

this isn't about preferential voting. We aren't the only ones complaining, personally I don't care about the preferential voting agreement, what I care about is the fact that these district maps are un-democratic and the regions are hardly any better considering we had already agreed there would be 10 states per region and that there should be no more than a 2 person difference between districts.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20702
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2004, 04:20:41 pm »
Ignore

Nym, Dan & Harry all approved it by voting in it. Shapeshifter's proposed rule was non-existent at the time of the vote. A new rule should not apply retroactively to convict somebody in the past of committing a crime-- because in that case we would ALL be guilty of committing a crime by participating in an invalid vote for the ratification of the constitution.


Dan voted for it because he thought that someone official had called for a vote on it.  I voted for it because I thought Dan had approved of it.


NO ONE IS OFFICIAL!?!?  Are you saying the President has no power Nick G.  Are you saying that the President was not elected?

Exactly my point. Happy to see, that this issue is not a partisan one.

Supersoulty, which "official" approved of the presidential election? None, because there was no official. So I wonder who this "official" is who you are referring to.  Maybe his name is Nym90? Guess what.. Nym90 participated in the thread!! And his VP Harry participated in Lewis's earlier thread set up in the same way!

also, now you are saying demrep isn't offical? I would say he is official for being a member of the cabinet.



The people of the atlas "approved" of Nym, so there fore, he became official in the absence of officality.  He appointed a cabinet that was official.  As I explained before, Dan is official, I never siad otherwise, but he figured that it had been approved by someone official like Nym of Harry.  HELL, how would we even know if they approved of something or not, Nym never comunicates with us anyway.
Logged

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2004, 04:22:57 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

First of all, I did not even vote ON the PV part in the FIRST un-official vote thread. I kept it blank because I foudn the whole thing confusing.

alright Shapeshifter, then why didn't you complain at the time that you didn't know what this issue was?
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2004, 04:24:43 pm »
Ignore

As I explained before, Dan is official, I never siad otherwise, but he figured that it had been approved by someone official like Nym of Harry.  HELL, how would we even know if they approved of something or not, Nym never comunicates with us anyway.

Well Nym did vote in that particular thread, so why would he have voted in it if he thought it was illegitimate? If he didnt approve it he would have said so instead of participating in it.

JFK - not everyone agreed 10 states per region. But I agree that the contradiction needs to be resolved, only because it is a contradiction.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2004, 04:26:33 pm by Beet »Logged
ShapeShifter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2749


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2004, 04:26:03 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

First of all, I did not even vote ON the PV part in the FIRST un-official vote thread. I kept it blank because I foudn the whole thing confusing.

alright Shapeshifter, then why didn't you complain at the time that you didn't know what this issue was?

because It JUST came to my attention, by the way Beet, you voted FOR PV[not popular voting] So did you and NickG. You and him keep bringing it up about how we voted against it, and you voted FOR it. I will bet you, that the majority would find PV[not popular voting] unpopular.
Logged

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2004, 04:28:43 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

First of all, I did not even vote ON the PV part in the FIRST un-official vote thread. I kept it blank because I foudn the whole thing confusing.

alright Shapeshifter, then why didn't you complain at the time that you didn't know what this issue was?

because It JUST came to my attention, by the way Beet, you voted FOR PV[not popular voting] So did you and NickG. You and him keep bringing it up about how we voted against it, and you voted FOR it. I will bet you, that the majority would find PV[not popular voting] unpopular.

Shapeshifter, it just came to your attention that you left something blank b/c it was confusing? If you thought it was confusing & left it blank, you knew it was confusing then, but didn't say anything. The point is, if it had failed I would have accepted it. I voted for plan "A" regions and districts maps and that failed and I accepted it.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7509


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 03, 2004, 04:30:24 pm »
Ignore

Since you, super, Shapeshifter voted against the pref. voting, but it passed, and you're trying to say it was invalid.

The contradictions should be dealt with in their entireties, without taking out the entire vote. The specifics of prefvoting should be clarified without taking out the vote on the idea of prefvoting which passed.

First of all, I did not even vote ON the PV part in the FIRST un-official vote thread. I kept it blank because I foudn the whole thing confusing.

alright Shapeshifter, then why didn't you complain at the time that you didn't know what this issue was?

because It JUST came to my attention, by the way Beet, you voted FOR PV[not popular voting] So did you and NickG. You and him keep bringing it up about how we voted against it, and you voted FOR it. I will bet you, that the majority would find PV[not popular voting] unpopular.

Shapeshifter, it just came to your attention that you left something blank b/c it was confusing? If you thought it was confusing & left it blank, you knew it was confusing then, but didn't say anything. The point is, if it had failed I would have accepted it. I voted for plan "A" regions and districts maps and that failed and I accepted it.

but the selected plan was contradictory to the constitution, therefore either one or the other MUST be invalid and it is a far better idea to invalidate that vote.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15790


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2004, 04:31:46 pm »
Ignore

Yes, you invalidate the part that was contradictory, no disagreement here.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7509


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2004, 04:33:19 pm »
Ignore

Yes, you invalidate the part that was contradictory, no disagreement here.

which were the region and district plans, so they should be changed.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines