Who was the most "electable" candidate for both parties, by year? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:46:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Who was the most "electable" candidate for both parties, by year? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who was the most "electable" candidate for both parties, by year?  (Read 6918 times)
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,700
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

« on: June 06, 2014, 10:48:28 PM »

2000: (D) Al Gore. Moderate enough for the swing voters compared to Bradley.
(R) McCain. Could have taken a more convincing win due to his more moderate stances. Bush, however, was a better primary campaigner.
2004: (D) Wesley Clark. Seen as a political outsider with war experience, had great appeal to moderates and southerners and could make connections to liberals too.
2008: (D) Obama. He put together a winning coalition that stayed together for 2012 (for the most part) and was a master of media.
(R) Romney. McCain was seen as too old, and not energetic, but whatever way you spin this election, Obama wins anyway. I don't think Huckabee was much better, especially socially, where he had nearly no appeal to swing voters.
2012: (R) Hunstman. He could have taken Florida and Ohio from Obama, if not a few more states.
2016: (D) Obviously Clinton. Momentum, money, experience,
(R) Rand Paul. Eww I hate him, but he has appeal to the youth. Much more than any other Repub...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.