Bush/Cheney v Gore/Kerry (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:12:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Bush/Cheney v Gore/Kerry (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bush/Cheney v Gore/Kerry  (Read 6650 times)
California Dreamer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 445


« on: April 04, 2004, 12:58:53 AM »

Jonh Kerry was Gore's 2nd choice...in such a close election would it have made a difference

Lieberman was a comprimise choice, much of which was trying to provide cover for the Clinton indescesions. Lieberman was the 'moral authority'. Had Clinton not been caught playing hide the cigar Kerry would have been the VP nominee.

so...would Kerry have helped carry any other states? like New Hampshire?

would Nader have got less support with a less conservative VP?
Logged
California Dreamer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 445


« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2004, 01:13:55 AM »

excelent points JFK

one only needs to look at democratic primaries of this year to see that there is no such thing as 'joementum'...Kerry would have been a much better VP candidate and would have excelled in the traditional role of 'attack dog', allowing Gore to remain 'presidential'.

As it turned out Lieberman was waay to much of Mr Nice guy.  He is a good man, but a bad candidate.

I feel fairly certain Gore would have won with Kerry on the ticket.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.