Schweitzer decides to NOT run for Senate, says he wants to stay in Montana
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 02:35:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Schweitzer decides to NOT run for Senate, says he wants to stay in Montana
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Schweitzer decides to NOT run for Senate, says he wants to stay in Montana  (Read 1315 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,047
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 13, 2013, 01:22:03 PM »

Link

So does it seem like he's denying a presidential run too, with him wanting to stay in Montana and away from DC? Or is it just an excuse to not run for Senate, so he can run for President?

Too bad about the Democrats' chances in this Senate race though, with Baucus retiring in 2014.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,540
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2013, 01:30:57 PM »

We should just assume at this point that Brian Schweitzer will not be a presidential (or VP) contender in 2016 -or ever, for that matter.  There is no reason to keep hope alive for him now since he evidently sees his Montana governorship as the culmination of his political career. 
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2013, 02:01:36 PM »

He doesn't want to leave Montana. If that isn't a retirement announcement I don't know what is. I guess you can say good bye to the Clinton/Schweitzer ticket now.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2013, 02:12:05 PM »

He doesn't want to leave Montana. If that isn't a retirement announcement I don't know what is. I guess you can say good bye to the Clinton/Schweitzer ticket now.

I always thought his being a senator made her less likely to pick him. Unless she had no other good options, why would she open up the seat of a Democratic senator in a red state? But even more than that, Schweitzer has an independent streak and doesn't exude the loyal team player vibe Hillary is sure to be interested in. I myself don't think that rules out an Obama 2008 supporter like Tim Kaine. But it'd take a lot for her to pick someone with a risk of going off script like Schweitzer probably comes with.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,047
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2013, 02:49:23 PM »

He doesn't want to leave Montana. If that isn't a retirement announcement I don't know what is. I guess you can say good bye to the Clinton/Schweitzer ticket now.

I always thought his being a senator made her less likely to pick him. Unless she had no other good options, why would she open up the seat of a Democratic senator in a red state? But even more than that, Schweitzer has an independent streak and doesn't exude the loyal team player vibe Hillary is sure to be interested in. I myself don't think that rules out an Obama 2008 supporter like Tim Kaine. But it'd take a lot for her to pick someone with a risk of going off script like Schweitzer probably comes with.
If he doesn't want to leave Montanta, he might not even be interested in VP.
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,162
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2013, 02:59:35 PM »

Oh well. He would've been a good senator, but I can certainly understand not wanting to stay in Washington for the majority of your time.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,047
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2013, 03:17:40 PM »

Apparently the opposition research on him was looking horrible, and Schweitzer realized it would ruin him

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/07/13/schweitzer-wont-run-for-senate-in-2014/
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2013, 05:22:43 PM »

hopefully he stays in montana for good.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2013, 06:38:52 PM »

Unfortunately, it looks like he's calling it a career.  Too bad, because he would have been the best alternative to the Hillary machine.  Now, I've got to switch my support to someone else who can beat Hillary.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,207
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2013, 07:11:19 PM »

He doesn't want to leave Montana. If that isn't a retirement announcement I don't know what is. I guess you can say good bye to the Clinton/Schweitzer ticket now.

I always thought his being a senator made her less likely to pick him. Unless she had no other good options, why would she open up the seat of a Democratic senator in a red state? But even more than that, Schweitzer has an independent streak and doesn't exude the loyal team player vibe Hillary is sure to be interested in. I myself don't think that rules out an Obama 2008 supporter like Tim Kaine. But it'd take a lot for her to pick someone with a risk of going off script like Schweitzer probably comes with.
It doesn't open up a sets. Montana's governor, Steve Bullock, is a relatively liberal Democrat. And a popular one at that. He'd appoint one of the many also popular statewide Democrats to the seat.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,406
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2013, 09:29:07 PM »

Sad Now who'll be Montana's Senator
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,540
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 13, 2013, 10:04:58 PM »


A Republican now, in all likelihood. 
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2013, 10:57:01 PM »

He may want to run for the white house but it's highly doubtful he'll win the nomination in 2016.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2013, 05:29:56 AM »

He may want to run for the white house but it's highly doubtful he'll win the nomination in 2016.

If he's not running for senate, he will not be running for president or consider a vice-presidential pick from the nominee.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2013, 06:34:03 AM »

The polls with Schweitzer candidate for the Senate in 2014.

Brian Schweitzer (D) vs Steve Daines (R)    

Public Policy Polling    (June 21–23, 2013)    48% vs 45%    
Harper Polling    (April 27–28, 2013)    50% vs 40%    
Public Policy Polling    (February 15–17, 2013) 48% vs 45%    

Brian Schweitzer (D) vs Champ Edmunds (R)    

Public Policy Polling    (June 21–23, 2013)    52% vs 37%
Public Policy Polling    (February 15–17, 2013) 52% vs 37%

Brian Schweitzer (D) vs Tim Fox (R)    

Public Policy Polling    (February 15–17, 2013) 49% vs 43%    

Brian Schweitzer (D) vs Marc Racicot (R)    

Public Policy Polling    (June 21–23, 2013)   46% vs 47%    
Harper Polling    (April 27–28, 2013)    47% vs 43%
Public Policy Polling    (February 15–17, 2013) 45% vs 46%    

Brian Schweitzer (D) vs Corey Stapleton (R)

Public Policy Polling    (June 21–23, 2013)   52% vs 38%    
Public Policy Polling    (February 15–17, 2013)    49% vs 39%    
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2013, 11:53:36 AM »

So Daines and Racicot had the best chances of winning. I expect Daines to officially jump in now that the most formidable candidate is out.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 14, 2013, 01:19:35 PM »

is probable....
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2013, 07:18:08 PM »

He may want to run for the white house but it's highly doubtful he'll win the nomination in 2016.

If he's not running for senate, he will not be running for president or consider a vice-presidential pick from the nominee.

Why don't you think he will run for president?
Logged
mattyman
Rookie
**
Posts: 92
New Zealand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2013, 07:32:11 PM »

So Daines and Racicot had the best chances of winning. I expect Daines to officially jump in now that the most formidable candidate is out.

PPP had Daines with solid leads in hypothetical match ups with Denise Juneau, Monica Lindeen (both polled late June) and Nancy Keenan (polled in feb).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 13 queries.