how would a "no-bullsh**t" third party ticket do
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:06:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  how would a "no-bullsh**t" third party ticket do
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: how would a "no-bullsh**t" third party ticket do  (Read 1017 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 15, 2013, 09:07:11 PM »

it would involve someone like Adam Carolla or Bill Maher on the ticket. Brutally honest and says things exactly how they feel and is against cherry picking and always uses facts to back up what they believe. Incorporates rhetoric from both right and left but is pretty anti-hyperbole. Sort of a "what you get is what you see" kind of ticket.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2013, 09:20:03 PM »

If we have someone like that that opens out eyes and participates in the debates, possibly like Ross Perot, but a little less than what he did because voters in this country have become more party-line.
Logged
Down the Gurney
Rookie
**
Posts: 63


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2013, 10:16:48 PM »

Unless the two parties have unpopular nominees like in '92, moderate third parties just don't work. Moderates can work if Libs or Cons support them, but without those bases one's only potential supporters are a very small group of people.
In other words, people like blowhards they like far more than moderates they can stand.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,607
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2013, 10:21:06 PM »

I think they will be well recieved by the electorate, but in a 2-party system such as ours, many people would be like, "Yes, I like them, but I wish they were in my party", and then go and vote for their candidate.

Probably a 1992 Ross Perot-esque performance with a high PV total, no EVs, support from left/right/center/non-voters, and denies anyone a majority. Losing party blames them.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2013, 11:51:38 PM »

There's only one way to tell. Candidates have to BS things or else the uninformed won't vote for them and they'll never win. It's all about making promises that lead people to think "if I vote for him I'll get something for free."
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2013, 12:06:00 AM »

Adam Carolla is a right-wing nut.
Logged
Asian Nazi
d32123
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,523
China


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2013, 12:59:03 AM »


And Bill Maher is an anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2013, 01:01:37 AM »

I think there are several moderates in both parties who could do a good job as president and run on an independent ticket, but they aren't likely to win.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2013, 01:29:19 AM »
« Edited: July 16, 2013, 01:33:13 AM by eric82oslo »

it would involve someone like Adam Carolla or Bill Maher on the ticket. Brutally honest and says things exactly how they feel and is against cherry picking and always uses facts to back up what they believe. Incorporates rhetoric from both right and left but is pretty anti-hyperbole. Sort of a "what you get is what you see" kind of ticket.

I love Bill Maher, but he's almost as left as you can get though. It's almost like even Elizabeth Warren seems like a sweet, innocent girl next to him. Tongue

What about Jon Stewart? He is at least much more centrist than Bill Maher.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2013, 02:01:47 AM »


But your not going to say anything about Bill Maher? Ha.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,143
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2013, 03:28:03 AM »

how would a "no-bullsh**t" third party ticket do




Are people forgetting already about Ross Perot in 1992 and Ralph Nader in 2000?





They're used as scapegoats by the two major parties and the corporate news media which loves, loves, loves having only a two-way horserace. (Screw all you "fringe" people running for the presidency! Only a person with a "R" or a "D" may run.)
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2013, 11:21:38 AM »

I love Bill Maher, but he's almost as left as you can get though.

He's viciously anti-Occupy.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2013, 12:09:32 PM »

Every third party ticket tries to be "no-bullsh**t". See where that's gotten 'em.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2013, 12:36:16 PM »

I love Bill Maher, but he's almost as left as you can get though.

He's viciously anti-Occupy.

He would have to be to be considered "no bullsh**t".
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2013, 01:25:39 PM »

I love Bill Maher, but he's almost as left as you can get though.

He's viciously anti-Occupy.

Is he? At the same time I don't think he's supporting the 1% either. Tongue Being anti-Occupy and not supporting the 1% is a bit like being anti-feminist and still support Hillary for president. Tongue Maybe you don't necesarily support the behaviour of the Occupy Wall Street guys, but supporting their policy proposals is a no-brainer. The vast majority of Americans want to see the 1% richest Americans pay more in taxes, as the exit polls clearly showed on election night. The American voice on this is almost as unanimous as it is in favor of background checks for gun sales.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2013, 01:30:05 PM »

I love Bill Maher, but he's almost as left as you can get though.

He's viciously anti-Occupy.

He would have to be to be considered "no bullsh**t".

The only time I think I've personally heard Maher say something that wasn't particularily left wing or populist was when he defended Israel against Palestinian attacks. Then he sounded just like a Republican. Yet that's the only incident that comes to my mind right now. In any case it isn't particularily shocking for a Democrat to be rather hawkish and conservative on foreign policy. Even Kirsten Gillibrand is very conservative when it comes to policy related to Israel.
Logged
stevekamp
Rookie
**
Posts: 65
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2013, 11:29:39 PM »

In a three-way context, would be unlikely to carry any states.  Closest state level models are Minnesota (Ventura) and Maine (Angus King). Other states would have a siphon effect like Perot 1992 (finished second in Maine and Utah, third everywhere else) or on a smaller scale, Nader 2000 (NH, Fla).
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2013, 05:39:56 AM »

Pretty badly. It invites them to be held to an impossible standard (IE- Would the no-bullsh**t party care to explain the history of third-party campaigns in the United States, as well as what qualifies them to run one of the biggest bureaucracies on the planet?) And there would likely be a point where they would really piss off a lot of voters, calling bullsh**t on something 75% of the populace likes.

But if you have a prominent enough figure calling out the shortcomings of Democrats and Republicans, along with some bold policy initiatives, it could get some support (five percent or so) in a race that lacks a figure with Obama's appeal.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2013, 10:50:48 AM »

it would involve someone like Adam Carolla or Bill Maher on the ticket. Brutally honest and says things exactly how they feel and is against cherry picking and always uses facts to back up what they believe. Incorporates rhetoric from both right and left but is pretty anti-hyperbole. Sort of a "what you get is what you see" kind of ticket.

About 2% on the national vote, if they are lucky and run a good campaign. I can see it getting a bit over 5% in a non-competitive state or two.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 11 queries.