If you had to pick a flat federal tax rate...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 07:20:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  If you had to pick a flat federal tax rate...
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: If you had to pick a flat federal tax rate...  (Read 2521 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,697


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2005, 04:54:04 PM »

My parents were poor. Now they're rich.

If your tax system were in place, we'd be middle class.

It used to be a lot easier to get rich than it is today.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2005, 04:58:54 PM »

Because most people would like to get rich, and would also prefer a decent economy.

They're dreaming - the likelihood of a poor getting rich is exceedingly remote.  A more reasonable course of action would be to vote in 'Eurosocialism'.

Seems to me that you've made a hard left turn from capitalist, to democrat to socialist. May I ask what brought that about?

Nothing's really changed - I always thought capitalism was great for the upper class.  I always had a fairly marxist understanding of how the economy works.  However now I'm just making the point that the majority of people would be voting in their economic interest if they voted for some redistribution.

'Marxist' and 'understanding' probably shouldn't be used in the same sentence.

I don't know why libertarians are so reluctant to face the fact that Capitalism, while it works exceedingly well for the top few percent of the population (primarily the owners),  is not particularly helpful for the lower classes.  You can still prefer it, just be honest about its effects.

Yeah. That's why poor people in socialist countries have such better living conditions than in the United States.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 27, 2005, 04:59:31 PM »

Because most people would like to get rich, and would also prefer a decent economy.

They're dreaming - the likelihood of a poor getting rich is exceedingly remote.  A more reasonable course of action would be to vote in 'Eurosocialism'.

Seems to me that you've made a hard left turn from capitalist, to democrat to socialist. May I ask what brought that about?

Nothing's really changed - I always thought capitalism was great for the upper class.  I always had a fairly marxist understanding of how the economy works.  However now I'm just making the point that the majority of people would be voting in their economic interest if they voted for some redistribution.

'Marxist' and 'understanding' probably shouldn't be used in the same sentence.

I don't know why libertarians are so reluctant to face the fact that Capitalism, while it works exceedingly well for the top few percent of the population (primarily the owners),  is not particularly helpful for the lower classes.  You can still prefer it, just be honest about its effects.

I have never once stated that capitalism has no drawbacks, however I believe that in the long run it benefits more people than any other system. I'm perfectly honest about it - my perception is just highly different than yours. It is my belief that the poor do benefit greatly from capitalism - it brings things that increase their quality of life within their reach that they could previously never have had. You are the one who seems to be in denial IMHO.

"The capitalist engine is first and last an engine of mass production which unavoidably means also production for the masses. . . . The capitalist achievement does not typically consist in providing more silk stockings for queens but in bringing them within the reach of factory girls for steadily decreasing amounts of effort." - Joseph Schumpeter
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 27, 2005, 05:01:35 PM »

People love socialism. You know, that's why communist countries never let their own citizens leave.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,797


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 27, 2005, 05:12:08 PM »

15% with an exemption for an individual who makes less than $30,000 and an additional $10,000 dollar exemption for each child.  I would then add a 5% national sales tax on high ticket items.

I agree with the use of sales tax to replace some of the income tax. It can be progressive by singling out uses that are generally beyond necessity. Sales taxes are also a better measure of the ability to pay than the income tax, since those who spend are demonstrating an ability to pay.

Income tax was much easier to track throughout the 20th century, since the sources of income (ie companies) were finite and tended to keep good records. With the rise of electronic transactions, it is just as easy to track sales as income. It is also easy to setup different rates for different items at the point of sale, and it is common in many states.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 27, 2005, 05:21:37 PM »

My parents were poor. Now they're rich.

If your tax system were in place, we'd be middle class.

It used to be a lot easier to get rich than it is today.

That is so true!  It was like falling off a log in the post-war era, through sometime in the early to mid 1970's. 
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 27, 2005, 06:33:01 PM »

We got rich in the 90s, and got a lot richer in the 00s.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.