A poll on gay marriage
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:33:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  A poll on gay marriage
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTION
#1
I support gay marriage
 
#2
I don't support gay marriage
 
#3
I am undecided
 
#4
I don't care
 
#5
What's gay marriage?
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: A poll on gay marriage  (Read 2045 times)
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,793
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 20, 2013, 10:10:47 AM »

3 days
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,536
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2013, 10:22:24 AM »

Support.  I am gay, and although I do not want to get married, the government has no business in telling me that I cannot.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,340
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2013, 01:01:41 PM »

I absolutely support gay marriage because I'm not a bigot.
Logged
RedSLC
SLValleyMan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,484
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2013, 01:06:24 PM »

Support.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,858
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2013, 02:30:01 PM »

Oppose. 
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,793
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2013, 03:32:43 PM »

Any reasons you'd like to offer as to why you oppose equal rights?
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2013, 03:46:26 PM »

I support, more from a 'strengthening of marriage' perspective.

It's not that high on the list of priorities though.
Logged
Consciously Unconscious
Liberty Republican
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2013, 04:04:05 PM »

What's gay marriage? 
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2013, 04:36:58 PM »

I'd like to see it legalized state by state, but leave it up to the states.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2013, 11:59:12 AM »

Personally: Oppose

Politically: The government has long abandoned marriage in any meaningful sense of the term. I'd prefer they call all state "marriages" civil unions. I'm largely indifferent to whether homosexuals get in on state marriages, but I'd gladly accept gay marriage in exchange for divorce or abortion restrictions.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2013, 12:15:28 PM »

Support



Personally: Oppose

Politically: The government has long abandoned marriage in any meaningful sense of the term. I'd prefer they call all state "marriages" civil unions. I'm largely indifferent to whether homosexuals get in on state marriages, but I'd gladly accept gay marriage in exchange for divorce or abortion restrictions.

That would be a horrible idea...
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2013, 12:21:08 PM »

Personally: Oppose

Politically: The government has long abandoned marriage in any meaningful sense of the term. I'd prefer they call all state "marriages" civil unions. I'm largely indifferent to whether homosexuals get in on state marriages, but I'd gladly accept gay marriage in exchange for divorce or abortion restrictions.

What does it mean to personally oppose gay marriage?

Does it mean you will not marry a person of your same sex?  Does it mean you won't buy your gay friend a new blender if they choose to get married?  Or do you just want to express your dislike of gay people?
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,858
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2013, 01:05:40 PM »


I have failed to encounter any compelling arguments as to why it should be legalized.  Therefore, I see no reason to change the status-quo. 
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,793
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2013, 01:12:42 PM »


I have failed to encounter any compelling arguments as to why it should be legalized.  Therefore, I see no reason to change the status-quo. 
Fail to allow gay marriage is discrimination. Even if you don't believe in their lifestyle, how could you be against giving people who love each other the mutual benefits of marriage?
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,536
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2013, 01:35:04 PM »


I have failed to encounter any compelling arguments as to why it should be legalized.  Therefore, I see no reason to change the status-quo. 

There certainly is no compelling (reasonable, secular) argument not to legalize it.  Therefore it should be legalized.  Conservatives talk a lot about "freedom", but it seems that they only mean freedom for "normal" people.

There are compelling reasons to legalize SSM.  One is reducing bullying and suicide, and no, that is not farfetched.  Bullying can lead to suicide, and suicide is common among people who believe that society hates them.  Fair laws alone cannot erase that, but they are vital first steps.  Certainly, adult politicians shouting "gay people are bad...we need to protect society from them fa**ots" does not help to alleviate problems with bullying and suicide.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,434
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2013, 02:07:49 PM »


I have failed to encounter any compelling arguments as to why it should be legalized.  Therefore, I see no reason to change the status-quo. 

You mean you just don't like the idea of two people having gay sex and so you latched onto the status-quo argument like a leech because it gave you an out?

In fact, I feel the opposite. I've never encountered a good argument against allowing homosexuals to marry each other.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,111
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2013, 03:04:50 PM »


I have failed to encounter any compelling arguments as to why it should be legalized.  Therefore, I see no reason to change the status-quo. 

How about gay people want it and it's none of your business to say they can't have it?
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,858
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2013, 05:32:40 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place. 

Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2013, 05:40:16 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place. 



That's deranged circular logic that I've heard a few conservatives use to get out of it.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2013, 05:42:06 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place.  


Yeah!  Just like the way banning interracial marriage wasn't discrimination because blacks were still free to marry blacks and whites were free to marry whites!  Roll Eyes
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2013, 06:02:32 PM »

Plus I'm pretty sure marriage is not an enumerated right, let alone specifying who can marry- I thought that was the logic (if I dare refer to it as that) for the Federal marriage amendment.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2013, 06:26:30 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place.  


Yeah!  Just like the way banning interracial marriage wasn't discrimination because blacks were still free to marry blacks and whites were free to marry whites!  Roll Eyes

When was interracial marriage illegal?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2013, 06:30:37 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place.  


Yeah!  Just like the way banning interracial marriage wasn't discrimination because blacks were still free to marry blacks and whites were free to marry whites!  Roll Eyes

When was interracial marriage illegal?

I think where was a better question...
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2013, 06:37:28 PM »

Discrimination can only occur when a group of people is being denied a right that is currently being extended to others.

Currently, there is no right to homosexual marriage.  There is only a right to heterosexual marriage.  The right to heterosexual marriage is extended to all people in the United States equally, including homosexuals.  Ergo, no discrimination is taking place.  


Yeah!  Just like the way banning interracial marriage wasn't discrimination because blacks were still free to marry blacks and whites were free to marry whites!  Roll Eyes

When was interracial marriage illegal?

I think where was a better question...

I see the argument against gay marriage as people are always free to marry the opposite gender. Therefore, gay marriage is like inventing the square wheel because it's a new invention. Furthermore, a marriage is a doorway to growing our population which is something gay marriage cannot do within itself. This is a good argument but I believe gays should have the right to marry each other if it's what they really want. However, I know gays who don't want anything to do with marriage because to them it's not part of the gay culture. Some gays don't want to be part of the straight culture anymore than straight people want to be part of the gay culture.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 21, 2013, 06:56:38 PM »

Let's be honest - people don't need marriage to breed.

Marriage has evolved constantly depending on the society they're within. Just as straight people don't have to marry, despite their having the right to, gay people will have the right to decide not to marry.

I'm being honest when I say, I understand those who oppose gay marriage, I just don't agree with any of the reasons outlined.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 14 queries.