NJ-Sen: NYT endorses Booker
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:27:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NJ-Sen: NYT endorses Booker		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NJ-Sen: NYT endorses Booker  (Read 359 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 02, 2013, 10:43:36 PM »
A bit surprising, thought they might go with Holt. For once I agree with them on an endorsement, perhaps the first time ever. Tongue
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2013, 04:37:22 AM »
What's surprising about it? He's a star politician. One of the leading forces of his generation. Smiley
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2013, 02:52:52 PM »
Is this even surprising?
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2013, 03:07:25 PM »
« Edited: August 03, 2013, 03:10:49 PM by Snowstalker »
Disgusting. Instead of the substantive progressive in the race (and the one they admitted was the best legislator) they back Wall Street's fluff candidate, Cory "Twitter" Booker.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2013, 03:11:46 PM »
Quote from: Snowstalker on August 03, 2013, 03:07:25 PM
Disgusting. Instead of the substantive progressive in the race (and the one they admitted was the best legislator) they back Wall Street's fluff candidate, Cory "Twitter" Booker.
Why endorse someone who's going to lose by 40 anyway?
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2013, 03:16:36 PM »
Quote from: NewYorkExpress on August 03, 2013, 03:11:46 PM
Quote from: Snowstalker on August 03, 2013, 03:07:25 PM
Disgusting. Instead of the substantive progressive in the race (and the one they admitted was the best legislator) they back Wall Street's fluff candidate, Cory "Twitter" Booker.
Why endorse someone who's going to lose by 40 anyway?

This sort of mentality is why nothing ever changes in Washington. Wall Street's horse always wins.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2013, 03:30:01 PM »
Disappointing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 12 queries.