Mellman said today it's a perfect tie.
I read the initial story and I read the follow up that included Mellman's pushback. However, I saw no comment suggesting he called the race a perfect tie. Maybe I missed that though. What I did read is he contended that "not ahead" doesn't mean "we're losing".
If we're playing with semantics, maybe that was his way of saying the race is tied. If that is the case, why not say it's a dead heat? Why not say it's within the margin of error? Why not say it's trending her way? There were a whole host of phrases he could have used that would have conveyed something more positive for her.
I would note the author of the US News and World Report piece, David Cantnese, said when he pressed Mellman for proof the race was tied, Mellman declined to offer any. OK, that's fine. He doesn't need to cowtow to a reporter, but I would say this. Mellman hasn't released any internal polling in more than a month. I think that speaks volumes, especially considering he's doing so in Udall's race.
One last piece of data. One of the state's longtime political reporters, Ronnie Ellis, wrote a story today suggesting bad news for Grimes. That's just his opinion, but he included this quote. He said at a campaign rally last Friday, October 24, one of Grimes' top advisors, unprovoked, told him, “Well, whatever happens we gave him a run for his money.”
http://www.glasgowdailytimes.com/opinion/ronnie-ellis-bad-signs-for-grimes-campaign/article_22debd54-610a-11e4-8235-9bd47825df3f.html