The first election in which the D was left-wing and the R was right-wing
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:10:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  The first election in which the D was left-wing and the R was right-wing
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: The first election in which the D was left-wing and the R was right-wing  (Read 10494 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 26, 2013, 02:07:25 AM »

I might say as recent as 1980 thinking about it again. Ronald Reagan was the very first true  conservative to ever be in the White House.

If you think that, then you have a very odd definition of conservative.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 26, 2013, 02:13:56 AM »

I might say as recent as 1980 thinking about it again. Ronald Reagan was the very first true  conservative to ever be in the White House.

If you think that, then you have a very odd definition of conservative.

I meant conservative as it's defined today.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 26, 2013, 01:01:39 PM »

1896.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 26, 2013, 10:42:34 PM »

I might say as recent as 1980 thinking about it again. Ronald Reagan was the very first true  conservative to ever be in the White House.

If you think that, then you have a very odd definition of conservative.

I meant conservative as it's defined today.

How pray tell, by any modern definition of conservative, would Grover Cleveland fall short of that standard?  Well other than the fact he wasn't a warmonger who wanted America intervening outside its borders.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2013, 10:47:19 PM »

I might say as recent as 1980 thinking about it again. Ronald Reagan was the very first true  conservative to ever be in the White House.

If you think that, then you have a very odd definition of conservative.

I meant conservative as it's defined today.

How pray tell, by any modern definition of conservative, would Grover Cleveland fall short of that standard?  Well other than the fact he wasn't a warmonger who wanted America intervening outside its borders.

Right that isn't something I would consider to be true conservatism. The issues are so different today from over a century ago that I wouldn't compare things.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,657


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2013, 04:26:32 PM »

In few words
1896 was the first time in which the Democrats were on the left and the Republicans were on the right but this aligment was reversed in some elections after that
1932 was the first election of a non-interrupted sequence of elections in which the Democrats were on the left and the Republicans were on the right
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2013, 12:11:29 PM »

Obviously the 1896 election.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,657


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 07, 2013, 04:58:23 PM »

So, 1896 was the first.

But, maybe, Franklin Roosevelt was more important than Willian Bryan in bringing the Democratic Party permanently to the left.

Even after Willian Bryan both the democrats and the republicans had progressive and conservative wings.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 19, 2013, 09:02:30 PM »

1920?
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 19, 2013, 09:07:07 PM »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2014, 09:38:45 PM »

I totally forgot about the election of 1872!!!
Yep, that would be it.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 07, 2014, 09:55:47 PM »

Between 1872-1952 it varied from election to election.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,657


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: January 14, 2014, 06:42:20 PM »

How did the party of the slave owners become the party of the working class?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2014, 08:08:51 PM »

How did the party of the slave owners become the party of the working class?

Those slave owners liked to think of themselves as working class yeoman farmers tragically burdened with owning slaves because of circumstances beyond their control.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2014, 08:36:16 PM »

How did the party of the slave owners become the party of the working class?

Because at the time the going assumption was that continuing slavery would protect them from the blacks moving north and taking their jobs away. In fact it was only the spectre of slavery being foisted on the north caming to the fore in the 1850's, did enough of them shift to the other way of thinking, that keeping slavery would be more of a risk then abolishing it with regards to creating more compeition, thus allowing for Lincoln to win. And Lincoln himself ran on a more moderate platform of just keeping it out of the territories and as seen in the Lincoln movie he had to tie abolition in with the war in order to effect the abolition.

It is also the case that the opposition was dominated by highly elitist aristocratic types, though the Whigs certainly did better than the Federalist, but not by much. A lot of poor farmers and working class types in places like Eastern TN and KY were Whig though on the other hand.

The Democratic Party has always sough to cast itself as the party of "the common man" and was always a rather populist outfit thusly, as well as majoritarian. If the common man was racist then of course the party of populism over elitism would reflect that view.
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,154
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: January 24, 2014, 09:32:16 PM »

 1980 is the correct answer, in modern terms.
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: January 24, 2014, 09:49:08 PM »

1980 is the correct answer, in modern terms.
Eh, Carter wasn't really that liberal, ever read his diary? 1984  would probably be better, and even then....
Logged
Mordecai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,465
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: January 24, 2014, 10:03:15 PM »

1980 is the correct answer, in modern terms.

Carter was a Southern conservative. Why do you think he and Ted Kennedy hated each other so much?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: January 25, 2014, 10:25:07 AM »

1980 is the correct answer, in modern terms.

Uh.... Like at least half of all elections before that? I mean if you're not gonna recognize 1896, then there are still about a million other freakin' examples. Just even frickin' 1972. McGovern's ideology doesn't now count as conservative or something. Hell, 1964 would be a bad answer but it'd at least cover a bit more ground than frickin' 1980.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: January 25, 2014, 01:35:09 PM »
« Edited: January 25, 2014, 01:38:16 PM by shua »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)

generally Greeley had been left-wing, but by 1872 could call him that on the major issues of the day?
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: January 25, 2014, 01:37:33 PM »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)

Why 1872?  Can Tilden be called left-wing, even in relation to Hayes?
We are talking in relation to the gold standard, Grant was conservative on it, Tilden was liberal on it.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: January 25, 2014, 01:54:41 PM »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)

generally Greeley had been left-wing, but by 1872 could call him that on the major issues of the day?

If you think about how Reconstruction was applied, via military rule that empowered corrupt Republican regimes in the South, there is actually a fairly convincing argument that he was the more liberal candidate.  As well, there is the argument about the corruptness of the Grant Administration.

There is a reason why they were called the "Liberal Republicans" instead of say the "Conservative Republicans."
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: January 25, 2014, 02:53:53 PM »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)

Why 1872?  Can Tilden be called left-wing, even in relation to Hayes?
We are talking in relation to the gold standard, Grant was conservative on it, Tilden was liberal on it.

I'm pretty sure Tilden was a "Bourbon" and both Hayes and Tilden were in favor of sound money. There were in fact very few differences between the candidates.
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: January 25, 2014, 03:01:54 PM »

I'm surprised nobody has suggested 1872 (although 1896 was the turning point between when it was an exception and the norm)

Why 1872?  Can Tilden be called left-wing, even in relation to Hayes?
We are talking in relation to the gold standard, Grant was conservative on it, Tilden was liberal on it.

I'm pretty sure Tilden was a "Bourbon" and both Hayes and Tilden were in favor of sound money. There were in fact very few differences between the candidates.
Oops, I meant the 1872 liberal Republican candidate, sorry.
Logged
Illuminati Blood Drinker
phwezer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.42, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: January 25, 2014, 05:52:16 PM »

1960, 1964, 1968, 1972, and 1984 are all contenders.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 11 queries.